Teams

GJTC LSMITH

2023 USTA MIXED 18 & OVER - WS · MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - WS

7 players · average NTRP 3.90 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-05-18vs GJTC TKELLERLost 01
L#1 DoublesJames Dannibale / Tracy Hughes vs Randy Hurshman / Amy Espinoza-Hurshman4-6, 5-7
2023-05-10vs GJTC LSHARPWon 10
W#1 DoublesTracy Hughes / Andrew Limbach vs Brian Alano / Virginia McHugh6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2023-05-04vs GJTC CKOHLSLost 01
L#1 DoublesLisa Smith / Andrew Limbach vs John Hanna / Danielle Martens6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2023-05-03vs GJTC PDANIELSWon 21
W#1 DoublesLisa Smith / Andrew Limbach vs Bryan Baughman / Carrie Thornton7-6, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesCarly McGuire / Colby Grace vs Jennifer Thompson / Scott Nolan5-7, 3-6
W#3 DoublesCreed Clayton / Heather Hughes vs Jenna Berguin / David Pacini6-4, 6-0
2023-04-19vs GJTC CKOHLSWon 10
W#1 DoublesCarly McGuire / Andrew Limbach vs Mikael Jurkovic / Laureen Cantwell6-2, 6-3
2023-04-13vs GJTC LSHARPLost 01
L#1 DoublesColby Grace / Tracy Hughes vs Tina Hulihee / Shane Chatfield4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-04-12vs GJTC PDANIELSLost 01
L#2 DoublesCreed Clayton / Dana Elliott vs Jenna Berguin / David Pacini3-6, 6-7
2023-04-05vs GJTC TKELLERSplit 11
W#1 DoublesAndrew Limbach / Carly McGuire vs Brandon Keller / Taya McCallum7-5, 7-6
L#2 DoublesCreed Clayton / Lisa Smith vs Amy Espinoza-Hurshman / Randy Hurshman3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 8.0 - 18 & OVER - WS have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.98
Andrew Limbach
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.83
Carly McGuire
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.82
Creed Clayton
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.59
Tracy Hughes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
Dana Elliott
published 3.5
James Dannibale
published
Jolene Walker
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carly McGuire + Andrew Limbach15362% games+14.7% vs expected
Tracy Hughes + Creed Clayton134 matchesnot enough data
Carly McGuire + Creed Clayton224 matchesnot enough data
Tracy Hughes + Andrew Limbach213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Limbach
92W–46L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%56%43%
3.98
4
Carly McGuire
47W–28L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%87%12%
3.83
4
Creed Clayton
62W–54L career · 3 lines in 2023
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Tracy Hughes
91W–59L career · 3 lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.59
3.5
Dana Elliott
1W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
James Dannibale
10W–7L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Jolene Walker
4W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.