Teams

Team Tequila HCC - L. Oonk

2021 Hillsborough Adult 55 & Over · 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women

9 players · average NTRP 4.33 / REGION_3

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2021-03-27vs Hills - HCC/C. BartosLost 02
L#1 DoublesMelanie Clem / Lori Gonzalez vs Sharon Benson / Denise Agnew3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Jane Erbe vs Allegra Campos / Stephanie Gilcrease1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-02-27vs HCC - M. TurnesWon 10
W#2 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Jane Erbe vs Karen Blount / Tish Wissel6-1, 6-2
2021-02-25vs Hills - HCC/C. BartosSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Jane Erbe vs Joan Simmons / Sharon Benson4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMelanie Clem / Lori Gonzalez vs Kim Cashman-King / Karen Olson4-6, 2-6
2021-01-23vs Hills - HCC/C. BartosLost 01
L#1 DoublesJane Erbe / Michele Ironsmith vs Kim Cashman-King / Joan Simmons7-6, 2-6, 0-1
2021-01-16Won 10
W#1 DoublesMichele Ironsmith / Jane Erbe vs Susan Williams / Katherine Reed6-3, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 9.0 Adult 55 & Over - Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.98 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.51
Michele Ironsmith
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.38
Lori Gonzalez
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Elizabeth Street
published 4.5
4.05
Melanie Clem
published
3.78
Lisa Oonk
published 4
3.75
Kathy Moll
published
3.42
Kay Caldwell
published
Laurie Gereaue
published
Lisa Freeman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Lisa Oonk + Michele Ironsmith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Michele Ironsmith
158W–102L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%45%55%
4.51
Lori Gonzalez
128W–78L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%82%18%
4.38
4.5
Elizabeth Street
1W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Melanie Clem
1W–7L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
4.05
4
Lisa Oonk
217W–232L career · no lines in 2021
2%94%5%
3.78
Kathy Moll
4W–5L career · no lines in 2021
3%95%2%
3.75
Kay Caldwell
5W–10L career · no lines in 2021
72%28%<1%
3.42
Laurie Gereaue
3W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Lisa Freeman
2W–2L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.