Teams

Leis, Donna

2024 Adult 55 & Over-JXN · Women 9.0

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-07vs Walcott, VirginiaLost 02
L#1 DoublesBeth Rogers / Dianne Miles vs Elizabeth Caldwell / Virginia Walcott1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJane Kuebel / Kristine Ball vs Bobbie Miles / Debra Byrne1-6, 1-6
2024-03-24vs Walcott, VirginiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Ball / Jane Kuebel vs Debra Byrne / Virginia Walcott1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesM Donna Leis / September Moore vs Bobbie Miles / Rachel Causey2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesBeth Rogers / Dianne Miles vs Elizabeth Caldwell / Cindy Hannon3-6, 3-6
2024-03-24vs Walcott, VirginiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Ball / Jane Kuebel vs Laura Lamar / Virginia Walcott1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDianne Miles / Beth Rogers vs Rachel Causey / Bobbie Miles3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesSeptember Moore / M Donna Leis vs Elizabeth Caldwell / Debra Byrne2-6, 1-6
2024-03-17vs Walcott, VirginiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Ball / Jane Kuebel vs Debra Byrne / Bobbie Miles1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKaris Harbarger / Beth Rogers vs Jan Estrada / Cindy Hannon2-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesM Donna Leis / September Moore vs Laura Lamar / Rachel Causey2-6, 1-6
2024-03-10vs Walcott, VirginiaLost 03
L#1 DoublesKristine Ball / Jane Kuebel vs Virginia Walcott / Elizabeth Caldwell1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesKaris Harbarger / Beth Rogers vs Jan Estrada / Cindy Hannon3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesM Donna Leis / September Moore vs Laura Lamar / Rachel Causey2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Women 9.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Walcott, Virginia50150050
2Leis, Donna0501530180

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Dianne Miles
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.50
Karis Harbarger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.46
September Moore
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 30% · published
Jane Kuebel
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Kristine Ball
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
M Donna Leis
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Kuebel + Kristine Ball2725% gamesnot enough data
M Donna Leis + September Moore0521% gamesnot enough data
M Donna Leis + Dianne Miles0515% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Dianne Miles
1W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Karis Harbarger
4W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%<1%>99%
3.50
September Moore
19W–55L career · 10 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
3.46
Jane Kuebel
15W–14L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kristine Ball
8W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
M Donna Leis
6W–14L career · 6 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.