Teams

MJCCA (Pearline Franco)*

USTA Atlanta Winter - 40 & Over Weekday Women · 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)

17 players · average NTRP 2.70 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-01-02vs Cherokee Town (Christi Veach)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesSheila Cohen / Karen Katz vs Amber Almond / Sheila Hare7-6, 2-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNat Lanier vs Mary Stratton5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAdele Bedrick / Celia Chase vs Christi Veach / Robin Bowen0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPearline Franco / Elaine Perkins vs Sarah O'Brien / Sarah Williams4-6, 2-6
L#4 DoublesLisa Adams / Linda Damsker vs Cecelia Ratcliffe / Marilyn Cain1-6, 2-6
2023-12-12vs Sugar Creek (Holly Dietrick)*Lost 03
L#1 DoublesKaren Katz / Sheila Cohen vs Dawn Pope / Erica Weaver4-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesNat Lanier vs Sylvia Baker2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesElaine Perkins / Katharine Rizk vs Annie Canty / Safiyah Walcott4-6, 4-6
2023-12-05vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesElaine Perkins / Katharine Rizk vs Dianne Sullens / Linda Wittich7-6, 6-7, 6-7
L#1 SinglesSheila Cohen vs Anita Hibbler2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesPearline Franco / Karen Katz vs Rachel Flow / Clarese Williams3-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdele Bedrick / Celia Chase vs Cathy Breedlove / Carolyn Redfearn3-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesLinda Damsker / Cheryl Isaacs vs Karen Boyd / Rosie Cecil1-6, 6-3, 1-6
2023-11-28vs Cherokee Town (Christi Veach)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesElaine Perkins / Katharine Rizk vs Amber Almond / Sheila Hare4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesKaren Katz vs Mary Stratton2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCelia Chase / Pearline Franco vs Ellen Melcher / Christi Veach4-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesAdele Bedrick / Cheryl Isaacs vs Sarah O'Brien / Sarah Williams7-6, 2-6, 5-7
L#4 DoublesMargaret Breiner / Barbara Nathan vs Deborah King / Cecelia Ratcliffe0-6, 0-6
2023-11-14vs Sugar Creek (Holly Dietrick)*Lost 04
L#1 DoublesSheila Cohen / Karen Katz vs Janelle Blasingame / Arlene Reese1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPearline Franco / Maryann Ingham vs Annie Canty / Holly Dietrick1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCelia Chase / Miriam Haviv vs Deborah Bevelle / Rachel Zeigler5-7, 5-7
L#4 DoublesCheryl Isaacs / Margaret Breiner vs Safiyah Walcott / Emilie Hitron1-6, 2-6
2023-11-07vs Rockdale TC (Carolyn Redfearn)*Lost 05
L#1 DoublesKaren Katz / Carla Wertheimer vs Joan Powell / Dianne Sullens0-6, 6-4, 3-6
L#1 SinglesNat Lanier vs Anita Hibbler3-5
L#2 DoublesAdele Bedrick / Celia Chase vs Maryann McFarlin / Linda Wittich1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPearline Franco / Barbara Nathan vs Gail Black / Carolyn Redfearn3-6, 4-6
L#4 DoublesMargaret Breiner / Miriam Haviv vs Latoya Robinson / Clarese Williams3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings21 teams · 3.0 Women (Arrie Lugar)
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Cherokee Town (Christi Veach)*6025519238
2Brookstone CC (Maria Adams)*60191128279
3USTA Atlanta/Desiree Higgins5124617221
4CC of the South (Kerri Friedman)*5121922250
5Fields Club (Tracey Pred)*51201028280
6Sugar Creek (Holly Dietrick)*4221922263
7Riverside ST (Stacy Heerin)*42201023245
8Fieldstone (Christy Cullen)*42171327289
9USTA Atlanta/Jacqueline Wilson42181228271
10The Homestead (Michelle Lyons)*33161432291
11Bridgemill (Marlyn Wagner)*33151533296
12Crooked Creek (Lisa Rivas)*33141634315
13Hickory Springs (Marianne Gopel)*33151537323
14Life Time (Pamela Gross)*24131734271
15River Station (Holly Kornegay)*24121837299
16Atlanta CC (Polly Hogue)*24121838328
17TPC Sugarloaf (Jill Yost)*2482247352
18CC of Roswell (Sandra Lashley)*15131736302
19Kensington Farms (Ann Shipley)*15111942324
20Harrison (Michelle Sweeney)*0682248358
21MJCCA (Pearline Franco)*0603060391

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.35 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Miriam Haviv
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.47
Carla Wertheimer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.46
Lana Imerman
published
2.42
Celia Chase
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.40
Nat Lanier
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.39
Karen Katz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
2.34
Barbara Nathan
usually #4 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.29
Sheila Cohen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.28
Pearline Franco
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.27
Adele Bedrick
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.27
Linda Damsker
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Cheryl Isaacs
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
1.97
Margaret Breiner
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published
Elaine Perkins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Katharine Rizk
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Marion Shoenig
published
Maryann Ingham
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Celia Chase + Sheila Cohen1442% games+1.7% vs expected
Pearline Franco + Linda Damsker31432% games−8.1% vs expected
Margaret Breiner + Barbara Nathan0527% games−9.5% vs expected
Pearline Franco + Adele Bedrick0628% games−10.4% vs expected
Celia Chase + Adele Bedrick0514% games−15.9% vs expected
Pearline Franco + Barbara Nathan0930% games−17.9% vs expected
Celia Chase + Carla Wertheimer1535% gamesnot enough data
Elaine Perkins + Katharine Rizk1546% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Miriam Haviv
2W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Carla Wertheimer
13W–43L career · 1 line in 2024
60%40%<1%
2.47
Lana Imerman
4W–37L career · no lines in 2024
61%39%<1%
2.46
3
Celia Chase
8W–50L career · type A · 5 lines in 2024
72%28%<1%
2.42
Nat Lanier
5W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
2.40
Karen Katz
10W–50L career · 6 lines in 2024
78%22%<1%
2.39
2.5
Barbara Nathan
0W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.34
Sheila Cohen
17W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
93%7%<1%
2.29
Pearline Franco
10W–80L career · 5 lines in 2024
94%6%<1%
2.28
2.5
Adele Bedrick
4W–39L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.27
Linda Damsker
14W–77L career · 2 lines in 2024
95%5%<1%
2.27
2.5
Cheryl Isaacs
4W–18L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Margaret Breiner
3W–40L career · 3 lines in 2024
>99%<1%<1%
1.97
Elaine Perkins
2W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Katharine Rizk
3W–12L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Marion Shoenig
3W–21L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Maryann Ingham
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.