Teams

Piney Run - SCDC

2022 DC WTA Adult 40 & Over Winter · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.67 / WASHINGTON D.C.

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-03-19vs DC Tennis ClubSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPenelope Wilson / Wendy Harman vs Nathalie Ryan / Georgina Ardalan6-4, 2-2
L#2 DoublesKisha Clark / Annette Coram vs Beth Antunez / Erin Krieger5-7, 2-2
2022-03-12Won 10
W#2 DoublesAnnette Coram / Kisha Clark vs Azalea Candelaria / Perzavia Praylow6-2, 6-1
2022-03-05Won 10
W#2 DoublesKisha Clark / Wendy Harman vs Perzavia Praylow / Azalea Candelaria6-3, 2-2
2022-02-26vs DC Tennis ClubWon 10
W#1 SinglesPenelope Wilson vs Georgina Ardalan6-4, 6-2
2022-02-05Lost 01
L#2 DoublesJulie Knight / Kisha Clark vs Perzavia Praylow / Azalea Candelaria3-6, 4-4
2022-01-29vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#1 DoublesJulie Knight / Kisha Clark vs Jennifer Wine / Elizabeth Richardson2-6, 2-6
2022-01-22vs DC Tennis ClubLost 01
L#2 DoublesPenelope Wilson / Kisha Clark vs Jennifer Wine / Beth Antunez6-1, 1-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · DC WTA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Prince8120713157
2Piney Run - SCDC45151223187
3Love and Aces2651940251

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.73
Wendy Harman
published
2.66
Julie Knight
published
2.62
Sabrina Altema
published
2.59
JENNIFER JOY
published 3
2.59
Sandra Salstrom
published
2.50
Penelope Wilson
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.47
Annette Coram
published 2.5
2.41
Kisha Clark
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Wendy Harman + Sandra Salstrom8256% games+6.7% vs expected
Annette Coram + Wendy Harman5165% gamesnot enough data
Annette Coram + Penelope Wilson404 matchesnot enough data
Annette Coram + Sandra Salstrom224 matchesnot enough data
Annette Coram + Julie Knight213 matchesnot enough data
Sandra Salstrom + Kisha Clark033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Wendy Harman
47W–66L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
2.73
Julie Knight
35W–44L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Sabrina Altema
19W–35L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
2.62
3
JENNIFER JOY
20W–29L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Sandra Salstrom
37W–28L career · no lines in 2022
25%75%<1%
2.59
Penelope Wilson
36W–64L career · 3 lines in 2022
50%50%<1%
2.50
2.5
Annette Coram
30W–14L career · no lines in 2022
0%59%41%
2.47
2.5
Kisha Clark
54W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
0%76%24%
2.41

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.