Teams

CM PURPLE

2024 ITA MIXED - DEN · MIXED 6.5 - ITA

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-08-25vs NJ BLUELost 01
L#2 DoublesPhilippe Becquet / Katie Comisky vs Rachel Eng / Jim Burgert2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2024-08-18vs CACM REDSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDavid Tighe / Lydia Tzagoloff vs Christine Johnson / Richard Lynn6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKatie Comisky / Philippe Becquet vs Zachary Hustad / Katherine Cuevas2-6, 5-7
2024-08-11vs GTC REDLost 02
L#1 DoublesPhilippe Becquet / Katie Comisky vs Lauren Flynn / Brian Dutzar2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLydia Tzagoloff / David Tighe vs Adele Norton / Christopher Gilbert2-6, 2-6
2024-08-04vs CP BLUESplit 11
L#1 DoublesDavid Tighe / Lydia Tzagoloff vs Regina Fontaine / Talwin Filholm3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesPhilippe Becquet / Katie Comisky vs John Hathorn / Suzanne Killmer6-3, 6-2
2024-07-31vs NJ BLACKSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGeorge Armatas / Lydia Tzagoloff vs Jeff Richker / Bonita Thistle2-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesHolly Flannigan / David Tighe vs Rick Bonczynski / Renee Richker6-4, 6-4
2024-07-28vs CM GREENLost 01
L#2 DoublesDavid Tighe / Lydia Tzagoloff vs Taylor Weir / Mary Vivo3-6, 0-6
2024-07-14vs WP BLUELost 01
L#1 DoublesKatie Comisky / Philippe Becquet vs Tammy Chamberlain / Jarrid DeMaio4-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for MIXED 6.5 - ITA have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.44
Katie Comisky
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.18
Megan Fredricks
published 3.5
3.14
Paula Cohen
published
3.06
Pete Fredricks
published 3
3.00
David Goetz
published 3
2.97
David Tighe
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.78
Holly Flannigan
published
2.75
Lydia Tzagoloff
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
George Armatas
published
Philippe Becquet
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Megan Fredricks + Pete Fredricks12370% games+13.7% vs expected
Lydia Tzagoloff + David Tighe51143% games−11.4% vs expected
Katie Comisky + Philippe Becquet4156% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Katie Comisky
36W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%68%32%
3.44
3.5
Megan Fredricks
53W–20L career · type A · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Paula Cohen
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.14
3
Pete Fredricks
63W–28L career · no lines in 2024
<1%32%68%
3.06
3
David Goetz
42W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
3.5
David Tighe
35W–51L career · 5 lines in 2024
58%42%<1%
2.97
Holly Flannigan
9W–8L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Lydia Tzagoloff
88W–88L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%4%
2.75
George Armatas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Philippe Becquet
9W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.