Teams

Buttonwood - Palma

2024 IRMSL Adult 40 & Over · 4.0 Women-W 1

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / REGION_6

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-28vs IRMSL/Lovera/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesSandy Palma / Beth Daly vs Grace Pillari / Victoria Burgess6-4, 5-7, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTanya Mikel / Theresa Dubiel vs Carolyn Strong / Reinalyn Albrecht2-6, 2-6
2024-03-18vs VBTC - SoutherlyWon 10
W#2 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Tanya Mikel vs Lynn Southerly / Debbie Bochte3-6, 7-5, 1-0
2024-03-06vs IRMSL/Lovera/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesTheresa Dubiel / Regan Chatel vs Anna Haman / Lisa Thiesen2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2024-02-14vs IRMSL/Lovera/40&Over4.0WLost 01
L#3 DoublesMeridith Brady / Sandy Palma vs Anna Haman / Lisa Thiesen4-6, 1-6
2024-01-24vs VBTC - SoutherlyWon 10
W#3 DoublesSandy Palma / Meridith Brady vs Lynn Southerly / Tiffani Buckley6-1, 7-6
2024-01-10vs IRMSL/Lovera/40&Over4.0WLost 02
L#2 DoublesBeth Daly / Sandy Palma vs Rebecca Fulper / Carolyn Strong3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDina Cummings / Theresa Dubiel vs Lisa Thiesen / Anna Haman1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Women-W 1 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.72 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.99
Dina Cummings
published
Angela Ahmadi
published 4
3.71
Regan Chatel
published
3.70
Sandy Palma
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.67
Theresa Dubiel
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.62
Judy Zanchi
published
3.61
Beth Daly
published 4
Elisabeth Smith
published
Meridith Brady
published
Tanya Mikel
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Dubiel + Sandy Palma4353% gamesnot enough data
Sandy Palma + Dina Cummings7064% gamesnot enough data
Regan Chatel + Dina Cummings303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Dina Cummings
17W–0L career · no lines in 2024
<1%53%47%
3.99
4
Angela Ahmadi
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Regan Chatel
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%6%94%
3.71
Sandy Palma
119W–104L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%8%92%
3.70
Theresa Dubiel
48W–51L career · 4 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Judy Zanchi
3W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
3.62
4
Beth Daly
2W–4L career · no lines in 2024
21%79%<1%
3.61
Elisabeth Smith
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Meridith Brady
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Tanya Mikel
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.