Teams

Woodstra/Barr

2024 Adult 55 & Over Early Start Daytime · 8.0 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.83 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#3 DoublesKerry Reiling / Stephanie Stackhouse vs Zeny McCoy / Pamela van Ert7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2023-12-04vs Stankovsky/BolineLost 01
L#2 DoublesStephanie Stackhouse / Kerry Reiling vs Mary Donovan / Shelley Wagener4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathryn Schneider / Kerry Reiling vs Ann Stauch / Lisbeth Sjoblad3-6, 2-6
2023-10-02Lost 01
L#3 DoublesStephanie Stackhouse / Kerry Reiling vs Amy Biewen / Barbara Pjevach2-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.66 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.88
Kerry Reiling
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.87
Lynda Stout
published
3.84
Jan Harris
published
3.80
Dede Montgomery
published 4
3.76
Julie Woodstra
published
3.73
Patty Barr
published
3.71
Shae Rohling
published
3.65
Sybil Axner
published
3.24
Kathryn Schneider
published
3.17
Ann Buratti
published 3.5
Hillary Kiefer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Barr + Julie Woodstra5452% games+2.3% vs expected
Shae Rohling + Kerry Reiling5552% games−0.8% vs expected
Jan Harris + Lynda Stout224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Kerry Reiling
252W–157L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%80%19%
3.88
Lynda Stout
55W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%82%17%
3.87
Jan Harris
16W–8L career · no lines in 2024
1%87%13%
3.84
4
Dede Montgomery
7W–10L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Julie Woodstra
27W–14L career · no lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.76
Patty Barr
28W–23L career · no lines in 2024
5%92%3%
3.73
Shae Rohling
35W–33L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.71
Sybil Axner
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65
Kathryn Schneider
21W–24L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Ann Buratti
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
11%88%1%
3.17
Hillary Kiefer
1W–0L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.