Teams

Team 4 Lobsters

2025 NOVA Adult 55 & Over · NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 3.20 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-17Won 10
W#1 DoublesAhmed Elnaggar / Charlie Haake vs Adam Winsler / Sannasie Thiyagarajan6-1, 6-4
2025-08-12vs Team 2 Courtmasters PiF 55Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAhmed Elnaggar / Matthew Trimboli vs Ryan Poole / John Williamson2-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#3 DoublesDante Paragas / Christopher Gay vs John Qu / Michael Porturica6-7, 2-6
2025-08-07vs Team 3 ChallengersWon 10
W#1 DoublesTao Zhang / Matthew Trimboli vs Carlo Pizarro / Steve Polestak4-6, 6-0, 1-0
2025-08-03Won 10
W#1 DoublesCharlie Haake / Jeff Ross vs Rajiv Khandpur / Alfred Buck6-3, 6-2
2025-07-31vs Team 2 Courtmasters PiF 55Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAhmed Elnaggar / Matthew Trimboli vs Louis Dupuis / Christopher Swider7-5, 1-5
2025-07-22Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDante Paragas / Scott Johnson vs Adam Winsler / Rajiv Khandpur6-2, 6-7, 0-1
2025-07-19vs Team 2 Courtmasters PiF 55Lost 01
L#1 DoublesDante Paragas / Scott Johnson vs Michael Porturica / Murugavel Chengalvarayan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.18 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.75
Tao Zhang
published
3.48
Jeff Ross
published
3.34
Dante Paragas
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.33
Charles Altreuter
published 3.5
3.14
Matthew Trimboli
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
3.08
Jeff Gu
published
2.83
Charlie Haake
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.82
David Register
published 3
2.82
John Cummins
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charlie Haake + Matthew Trimboli213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tao Zhang
6W–4L career · no lines in 2025
4%93%4%
3.75
Jeff Ross
4W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
3.48
3.5
Dante Paragas
72W–63L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
3.5
Charles Altreuter
3W–4L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
3
Matthew Trimboli
119W–61L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.14
Jeff Gu
11W–12L career · no lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
3
Charlie Haake
28W–42L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%88%12%
2.83
3
David Register
9W–5L career · type S · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
John Cummins
9W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.