Teams

Team 2 Net Assets

2024 NOVA Adult 40 & Over Winter · NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women

7 players · average NTRP 2.75 / VIRGINIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-07vs Team 1 Double TroubleWon 10
W#3 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Amy Din vs Sarah Icore / Nandita Kalyan6-3, 7-6
2024-03-24vs Team 1 Double TroubleWon 20
W#1 DoublesKaren Harriman / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Amy Heuer / Heidi Davis5-7, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Amy Din vs Barbara Haber / Robin Bernhard6-1, 6-0
2024-03-16vs Team 4 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Harriman / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Ioulia Rytikova / Nicole Connell6-1, 6-0
2024-03-10vs Team 1 Double TroubleWon 10
W#1 DoublesKaren Harriman / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Amy Heuer / Asma Shah6-0, 6-1
2024-03-07vs Team 4 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Ohlweiler / Karen Harriman vs Mimi Vu / Anja Giphart7-5, 6-2
2024-02-02vs Team 1 Double TroubleWon 20
W#2 DoublesLory Choi / Lisa Ohlweiler vs Nicola Allen / Barbara Haber6-4, 6-1
W#3 DoublesKaren Boulineaux / Amy Din vs Kelly Walker / Robin Bernhard6-0, 6-1
2024-01-27vs Team 4 Deuces WildWon 10
W#1 DoublesLisa Ohlweiler / Karen Harriman vs Mimi Vu / Nicole Connell6-0, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NOVA Adult 40 & Over 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Lisa Ohlweiler
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
2.59
Karen Harriman
published
2.56
Marcy Davidson
published
2.49
Amy Din
usually #3 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
2.46
Joyce Aramburu
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published 3
2.43
Karen Boulineaux
published
2.42
Gayle Balba
published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Din + Lisa Ohlweiler404 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Aramburu + Amy Din123 matchesnot enough data
Joyce Aramburu + Lisa Ohlweiler123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Lisa Ohlweiler
31W–26L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%70%30%
2.93
Karen Harriman
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
25%75%<1%
2.59
Marcy Davidson
1W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
2.56
2.5
Amy Din
45W–70L career · 7 lines in 2024
0%52%48%
2.49
3
Joyce Aramburu
78W–180L career · type A · 9 lines in 2024
63%37%<1%
2.46
Karen Boulineaux
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
69%31%<1%
2.43
2.5
Gayle Balba
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
0%74%26%
2.42

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.