Teams

Earnheart/18/5.5/CWN/BREC

2026 BR Southern Combo 18 & Over - Women Night · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Night

13 players · average NTRP 2.70 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 upcoming · 5 played
Sep 16 6:30 PM
The Legacy @ Bonne Esperance
Sep 30 8:00 PM
Highland Park Tennis Center
Oct 7 6:30 PM
The Legacy @ Bonne Esperance
2026-09-09vs Derousselle/18/5.5/CWN/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesLeigh Bonfanti / Laura Ellender vs Sherri Nguyen / Rebecca Barham2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dooley / Allison Yates vs Ashley Vicks / Adriana Ramirez1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesLana Malone / Beth Couvillion vs Jennifer Derousselle / Emily Kinsley1-6, 1-6
2026-08-20vs Rodriguez/18/5.5/CWN/UCWon 21
L#1 DoublesBarbara Cerniauskas / Peggy Blouin vs Erin Hoffman / Jenna Fritscher7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLaura Ellender / Valerie Hall vs Katherine Landry / Madison Kron6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChristine Earnheart / Beth Couvillion vs Melissa Silva / Rachel Webre6-4, 1-6, 1-0
2026-08-12vs Blalock/18/5.5/CWN/SOACLost 12
W#1 DoublesChristine Earnheart / Rena Jacomina Bickham vs Michelle Lafleur / Jennifer Eiermann5-7, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesAnn Dooley / Allison Yates vs Jennifer Dewitt / Claire Saccardi0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesValerie Hall / Laura Ellender vs Samantha Donadieu / Samantha Blalock1-6, 6-3, 0-1
2026-08-05vs Cottano/ 18/ 5.5/ CWN/ BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesRena Jacomina Bickham / Katie Thorne vs Katie Bell / Irena Zajickova2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesLeigh Bonfanti / Lana Malone vs Shannon Ellis / Wyndi Guillory1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Blouin / Barbara Cerniauskas vs Amanda Ledet / Cameron Cottano6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2026-07-29vs Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BRECLost 03
L#1 DoublesRena Jacomina Bickham / Christine Earnheart vs Montana Chandler / Taylor Nauck3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dooley / Katie Thorne vs Amy Boudreaux / Katie Boudreaux0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesPeggy Blouin / Barbara Cerniauskas vs Johanna Fabian / Emily Ward0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings10 teams · 5.5 BR (18&O) Women Night
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Boudreaux/18/5.5/CWN/BREC3090133
2Cottano/ 18/ 5.5/ CWN/ BREC3090239
3Pearson/18/5.5/CWN/Leg3081232
4Blalock/18/5.5/CWN/SOAC3072770
5Dallalio/18/5.5/CWN/Leg2154970
6Derousselle/18/5.5/CWN/BREC12451184
7Pittman/18/5.5/CWN/Boc031817104
8Earnheart/18/5.5/CWN/BREC031817105
9Richard/18/5.5/CWN/CCLA031817108
10Rodriguez/18/5.5/CWN/UC030918108

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.27 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.65
Megan Milazzo
published
2.50
Ann Dooley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Christine Earnheart
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.45
Leigh Bonfanti
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.45
Rena Jacomina Bickham
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.38
Peggy Blouin
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.36
Laura Ellender
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.27
Valerie Hall
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.27
Barbara Cerniauskas
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.02
Beth Couvillion
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
1.95
Katie Thorne
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
1.93
Lana Malone
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
1.82
Allison Yates
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Katie Thorne + Rena Jacomina Bickham4840% games+1.3% vs expected
Beth Couvillion + Lana Malone2927% games−17.3% vs expected
Peggy Blouin + Barbara Cerniauskas1535% gamesnot enough data
Beth Couvillion + Katie Thorne044 matchesnot enough data
Christine Earnheart + Rena Jacomina Bickham224 matchesnot enough data
Ann Dooley + Leigh Bonfanti123 matchesnot enough data
Beth Couvillion + Peggy Blouin123 matchesnot enough data
Lana Malone + Katie Thorne123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Milazzo
1W–2L career · no lines in 2026
>99%<1%<1%
2.65
3
Ann Dooley
16W–38L career · 3 lines in 2026
50%50%<1%
2.50
3
Christine Earnheart
10W–22L career · 3 lines in 2026
60%40%<1%
2.47
Leigh Bonfanti
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
64%36%<1%
2.45
Rena Jacomina Bickham
15W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%66%34%
2.45
Peggy Blouin
9W–32L career · 3 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
2.38
Laura Ellender
19W–39L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.36
Valerie Hall
17W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Barbara Cerniauskas
5W–31L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%96%4%
2.27
2.5
Beth Couvillion
14W–39L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.02
Katie Thorne
7W–27L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.95
Lana Malone
6W–32L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.93
2.5
Allison Yates
7W–16L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
1.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.