Teams

Self-Parks

2023 One Doubles · 3.0 Women

2 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.94 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Deborah Self
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.77
Alana Rhea
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Results6 ties
2023-07-26Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Alana Rhea vs Nicola Ash / Wendi Ouellette7-6, 5-2
2023-07-14Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Alana Rhea vs Shannon Davis / Joanna Asia Wagner6-7, 6-0, 1-0
2023-07-01Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Laurel Hallock Koppelman / Heather Matteri6-4, 6-4
2023-06-29Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Jennifer Pultz / Carolyn Graeper6-2, 6-1
2023-06-22Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Valerie Regan / Trinity Treat6-1, 6-3
2023-06-15Lost 01
L#1 DoublesChristina Parks / Deborah Self vs Ericka Nelson / Heidi Palena6-4, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Deborah Self
106W–100L career
0%48%52%
3.12
3
Alana Rhea
78W–88L career
0%99%0%
2.77

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.