Teams

Uhlenhake/Knoxville

2025 Adult 55 & Over-Knoxville · 3.5 Adult 55 & over Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.25 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-04-26vs SMEAD/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Warrick / Linda Roback vs Angela Cutshall / Vicky Robinson5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTerri Bowers / Sandra Walker vs Mary Ellen Smartt / Ruth Jackson4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesLinda Bui / Sandy Garrard vs Mary Vineyard / Lynne Little4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2025-04-12vs Houck/Knoxville/55-3.5Lost 12
W#1 DoublesTracey Belmont / Laura Warrick vs Teresa Helton / Teri Henry6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Ginger Arthur vs Donna Worrell / Carol Irick2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesSandra Walker / Sandy Garrard vs Sharie Gaby / Donna French2-6, 7-6, 0-1
2025-04-09vs Wentz/KnoxvilleWon 21
W#1 DoublesLaura Warrick / Linda Roback vs Jennifer Hensley / Donna Walker6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLinda Bui / Ginger Arthur vs Shelly Ren / Angie Herzog4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMonica Casey / Michelle Uhlenhake vs Deborah Szwarc / Nancy Wentz3-6, 5-7
2025-04-05vs Dail/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / CHARLIE TONKIN vs Ann Curtin / Karen Dail6-2, 6-2
L#2 DoublesSandy Garrard / Linda Bui vs Kelly Carillon / Shirley Vaughan7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGinger Arthur / Tara Osborne-Martz vs Kelley Karnes / Jill Hoschette2-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-22vs Campbell/KnoxvilleLost 12
W#1 DoublesCHARLIE TONKIN / Laura Warrick vs Jennifer Campbell / Julie Burnette Kirkpatrick6-3, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMaggie Reynolds / Tara Osborne-Martz vs Shawna McConnell / Michelle Hull3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jenne MacCagli vs Kristy Bruce / Kelly Kramer6-7, 4-6
2025-03-15vs Daves/KnoxvileLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichelle Uhlenhake / Jenne MacCagli vs Elaine Vandiver / Linda Viehmann4-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesTara Osborne-Martz / CHARLIE TONKIN vs Caroline Sullivan / Sandy Hodson3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesSandra Walker / Maggie Reynolds vs Cynthia Reed / Patsy Fischer7-6, 5-7, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 55 & over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.04 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
CHARLIE TONKIN
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Laura Warrick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Linda Roback
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Tracey Belmont
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Michelle Uhlenhake
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.02
Jenne MacCagli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.00
Tara Osborne-Martz
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.97
Monica Casey
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Sandra Walker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.86
Sandy Garrard
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published
2.84
Ginger Arthur
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published 3
2.82
Linda Bui
usually #1 Doubles 38%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
2.79
Terri Bowers
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Ginger Arthur + Linda Bui4261% games+15.1% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Tracey Belmont2354% games+8.3% vs expected
Jenne MacCagli + Michelle Uhlenhake81640% games+3.3% vs expected
Linda Bui + Sandy Garrard3545% games+1.4% vs expected
Ginger Arthur + Michelle Uhlenhake3647% games+1.1% vs expected
Tara Osborne-Martz + Ginger Arthur2346% games+0.9% vs expected
Jenne MacCagli + Linda Bui3547% games−0.6% vs expected
Laura Warrick + Linda Roback171250% games−2.2% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
CHARLIE TONKIN
10W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%66%34%
3.45
Laura Warrick
55W–50L career · 6 lines in 2025
1%94%5%
3.29
Linda Roback
26W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
Tracey Belmont
22W–30L career · 1 line in 2025
10%90%1%
3.17
Michelle Uhlenhake
28W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.11
Jenne MacCagli
18W–34L career · 2 lines in 2025
43%57%<1%
3.02
Tara Osborne-Martz
24W–24L career · 3 lines in 2025
50%50%<1%
3.00
Monica Casey
3W–18L career · 1 line in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.97
Sandra Walker
6W–16L career · 3 lines in 2025
64%36%<1%
2.95
Sandy Garrard
30W–22L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
2.86
3
Ginger Arthur
42W–39L career · 7 lines in 2025
<1%88%11%
2.84
Linda Bui
32W–44L career · 8 lines in 2025
1%91%9%
2.82
Terri Bowers
6W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%93%5%
2.79

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.