Teams

Ra.Rosen18C

2025 Capital Combo 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-10-10vs Ke.Hurter18CSplit 11
W#1 DoublesDarsan Russo / Randi Rosen vs Amy Cantando / Angela McGee6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLinda Martini / Jennifer Cotner vs Janie Morgan / Megan Oneill4-6, 3-6
2025-10-03vs As.Randall18CLost 12
W#1 DoublesRandi Rosen / Maria Riemann vs Stephanie Burke / Kathryn Hamrick6-4, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKathryn Williamson / Jennifer Lewis vs Geri Russell / Rachel Creel1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesLinda Martini / Jane Bossert vs Sarah Hill / Azita Amini5-7, 0-6
2025-09-12vs Na.Dahir18CLost 01
L#1 DoublesDarsan Russo / Jennifer Cotner vs Kate Peckham / Lori Stevens4-6, 3-6
2025-09-05vs Co.Hicks18C2.5Lost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Cotner / Darsan Russo vs Mary Margaret Ross / Jessica Barringer3-6, 3-6
2025-08-29vs Ke.Hurter18CWon 10
W#2 DoublesDarsan Russo / Jennifer Fenner vs Kelly Hurter / Megan Oneill5-5
2025-08-22vs As.Randall18CLost 12
L#1 DoublesRandi Rosen / Kathryn Williamson vs Stephanie Burke / Mccall Moore5-7, 5-7
W#2 DoublesMaria Riemann / Lusally Hong vs Heidi Suke / Geri Russell6-4, 6-4
L#3 DoublesJane Bossert / Jennifer Lewis vs Ashley Randall / Mary Hannah Andrews1-6, 1-6
2025-08-01vs Co.Hicks18C2.5Won 10
W#2 DoublesJennifer Cotner / Darsan Russo vs Tucker Andrews / Molly Gorham6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.54
Jennifer Cotner
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.35
Kathryn Williamson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.35
Randi Rosen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Jane Bossert
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Lusally Hong
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.30
Mary McCulley
published
2.29
2.20
Linda Martini
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.13
Darsan Russo
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 2.5
Maria Riemann
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Darsan Russo + Jennifer Cotner123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

2.5
Jennifer Cotner
36W–26L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%40%60%
2.54
Kathryn Williamson
1W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
85%15%<1%
2.35
Randi Rosen
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%86%14%
2.35
Jane Bossert
10W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Lusally Hong
3W–2L career · 1 line in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
Mary McCulley
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
0%92%8%
2.30
2.5
Judith Hagopian-Edwards
111W–207L career · no lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.29
Linda Martini
0W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
2.5
Darsan Russo
67W–102L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.13
Maria Riemann
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.