Teams

SDNC 4.0 FRCC (3:2)/ Loew

2023 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC · SDNC - Men - 4.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.93 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2023-06-24vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC (3:2)/ SeagerWon 10
W#2 SinglesSteve Betterly vs Ron Seager6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesSteve Betterly / Brad Heise vs Eric Harnish / Robert Froyd2-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesEric Wang / Salil Upasani vs Venkatesh Canchi / Satish Jayanthi6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesSteve Betterly / Miroslav Krustev vs Greg Flaherty / Jim Grady4-6, 6-7
2023-04-23vs SDNC 4.0 Valley Center (3:2)/ ZengLost 01
L#1 DoublesSteve Betterly / David Rivkin vs Guangyuan Hu / Mark Motluck3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesVitor Roque / Steve Betterly vs Byrton Slack / Stefan Scheinert6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Men - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.65 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.07
MARCOS COHEN
published
3.72
Adam Loew
published 4
3.72
Andre Freund
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.72
Steve Betterly
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.67
Vitor Roque
published 4
3.67
Stanton Greene
published
3.58
Ali Behnam
published 4
3.53
Salil Upasani
usually #2 Doubles 38%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.23
Douglas Sain
published 3.5
Joshua Gaylis
published
Russell Silberstein
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Vitor Roque + Andre Freund5449% games+12.0% vs expected
Andre Freund + Salil Upasani8360% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

MARCOS COHEN
10W–2L career · no lines in 2023
<1%31%69%
4.07
4
Adam Loew
8W–17L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Andre Freund
119W–47L career · 4 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Steve Betterly
20W–12L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
3.72
4
Vitor Roque
47W–42L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
Stanton Greene
7W–5L career · no lines in 2023
10%90%1%
3.67
4
Ali Behnam
1W–3L career · no lines in 2023
28%72%<1%
3.58
4
Salil Upasani
84W–52L career · 7 lines in 2023
41%59%<1%
3.53
3.5
Douglas Sain
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
3.23
Joshua Gaylis
0W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Russell Silberstein
2W–15L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.