Teams

Oaksmith

2026 Howard Adult 18 & Over · Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women

18 players · average NTRP 3.45 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2026-06-04vs Chung - The RackettesWon 32
L#1 DoublesLorinda Rawlings / Elisabeth Garcia-Wade vs Sung Cho / Tricia Muneses1-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLynne Ensor vs Alexie Hoyle6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesGena Conron / Sarah Perkins vs Sanghee Lee / GENA CHUNG3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesLynn Gorman vs Anna Shin3-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesShrijoyee Ray / Tammi Molavi vs Linda Tsai / Maria Cristina Sanchez6-4, 6-5
2026-05-31vs Davidson - Sets In The CityLost 14
L#1 DoublesGena Conron / Sarah Perkins vs Catherine Donaldson / Kimberly Ford0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLorinda Rawlings vs Briana Stine4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Segrist / Margaret Asher vs Loan Nguyen / Nicole Brizan7-5, 4-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAudrey Oaksmith vs Maggie Johnson1-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Shrijoyee Ray vs Christina Ravekes / Rebecca MacKowiak6-2, 6-1
2026-05-26vs Super Smash SistersWon 41
L#1 DoublesJoanne Stine / Sarah Perkins vs Marilyn Moore / Allie Hildebrand2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLorinda Rawlings vs Denise Mangalino6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesElisabeth Garcia-Wade / Shrijoyee Ray vs Erin McVeigh / Heather Nesti6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesLynn Gorman vs Elizabeth Smith6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesGena Conron / Sandy Segrist vs Yulin Henry / Melissa Henry6-3, 6-4
2026-05-06vs mccullough - Bounce-tasticLost 14
L#1 DoublesSarah Perkins / Brenda Crowe vs Mary Li / Roshni Fifadra3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs Bari Abensohn6-4, 3-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMonica Targonski / Elisabeth Garcia-Wade vs Claire Taylor / Mihaela Pertea6-3, 6-0
L#2 SinglesMargaret Asher vs Paola Osaki5-7, 3-3
L#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Stephanie Ruskin vs Allison Mathis / Kathryn Painter2-6, 0-6
2026-05-03vs MacDonald - MacAttack 18+ 3.5Lost 23
L#1 DoublesBrenda Crowe / Gena Conron vs Corinna Dragulescu / Cintya Leveque3-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesLorinda Rawlings vs Karen Francis6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSherry Houff / Monica Targonski vs Jennie Kim / Casey Royster1-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesLynn Gorman vs Rosalba Davis6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSarah Perkins / Ashling Pollard vs Jean Chaisson / Maria Haslbeck0-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-27vs Ruggiero - Ladies of the NetWon 41
L#1 DoublesMollie Crocker / Brenda Crowe vs Alison Punsalan / Michelle Limeres6-0, 6-7, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLorinda Rawlings vs Amy Champion6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLynne Ensor / Elisa Oaksmith vs Renee Plazak / Jennifer Schied6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 SinglesAudrey Oaksmith vs Cheryl Royce6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSherry Houff / Stephanie Ruskin vs Wendy Hubbert / Leigh Tobin6-2, 6-1
2026-04-21vs Mabry - Will Play for ChardonnayWon 41
L#1 DoublesGena Conron / Joanne Stine vs Gina Seyfried / Susan Flaherty4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLorinda Rawlings vs Thu Pham6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesMonica Targonski / Elisabeth Garcia-Wade vs Kelly Cipolla / Natalie Sebeck6-4, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAudrey Oaksmith vs Amy Cohen6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Ashling Pollard vs Colleen D'Agrosa / Anjie Lynchard6-3, 7-6
2026-04-17vs Battista - Net Setters 18+Lost 23
L#1 DoublesMollie Crocker / Joanne Stine vs Brenda Poore / Elizabeth Goldy1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesSandy Segrist vs Keyonna Baker5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesSherry Houff / Monica Targonski vs Katherine Battista / Jennifer Nazaire6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAudrey Oaksmith vs Kathy Tuckey6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesGena Conron / Stephanie Ruskin vs Jill Comeaux / Linda Morris3-6, 7-6, 0-1
2026-04-11Won 30
W#1 SinglesLynne Ensor vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#2 SinglesShrijoyee Ray vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesTammi Molavi / Gena Conron vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2026-04-06vs Klyap - Life of a Tennis GirlLost 05
L#1 DoublesLorinda Rawlings / Joanne Stine vs Jeanne Celtnieks / Patricia Jenkins5-7, 6-2, 0-1
L#1 SinglesLynn Gorman vs Katie Young3-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesSherry Houff / Monica Targonski vs Karen Keane / Katie Wolven7-5, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAudrey Oaksmith vs Julia Heeter0-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesElisa Oaksmith / Margaret Asher vs Amy Lovas / Missy Burke1-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Howard Adult 18 & Over 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 18 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.40
Lorinda Rawlings
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
3.38
Lynne Ensor
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.38
Shrijoyee Ray
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published 3.5
3.28
Lynn Gorman
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.26
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.19
Tammi Molavi
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.18
Margaret Asher
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.14
Sandy Segrist
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.14
Gena Conron
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 3.5
3.13
Audrey Oaksmith
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Sherry Houff
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Monica Targonski
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Brenda Crowe
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.11
Mollie Crocker
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Ashling Pollard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.94
Elisa Oaksmith
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.92
Joanne Stine
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.70
Stephanie Ruskin
usually #3 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tammi Molavi + Stephanie Ruskin172048% games−1.1% vs expected
Stephanie Ruskin + Gena Conron131348% games−4.2% vs expected
Tammi Molavi + Gena Conron4356% gamesnot enough data
Sherry Houff + Monica Targonski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lorinda Rawlings
10W–6L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Lynne Ensor
39W–23L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.38
3.5
Shrijoyee Ray
125W–77L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
3.38
Lynn Gorman
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Elisabeth Garcia-Wade
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%3%
3.26
3.5
Tammi Molavi
115W–132L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%92%1%
3.19
Margaret Asher
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
9%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Sandy Segrist
116W–94L career · 3 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Gena Conron
86W–123L career · 7 lines in 2026
14%85%<1%
3.14
3.5
Audrey Oaksmith
3W–2L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
15%84%<1%
3.13
Sherry Houff
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
3.12
Monica Targonski
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
3.12
3.5
Brenda Crowe
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
19%81%<1%
3.11
Mollie Crocker
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
19%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Ashling Pollard
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.10
3.5
Elisa Oaksmith
2W–1L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.94
Joanne Stine
2W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
72%28%<1%
2.92
3
Stephanie Ruskin
141W–155L career · 6 lines in 2026
6%93%1%
2.70

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.