Teams

BAY CLUB SF TENNIS 40AW4.5A

2025 ADULT 40&Over · Women's 4.5

25 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women's 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.11 estimated across 23 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.49
Michaela Zuckova
published
4.32
Sueyin Wong
published
4.27
Clare Badaracco
published 4.5
4.27
Caroline Iwanchuk
published 4.5
4.27
4.23
Pratima Rao
published
4.23
Irene Otten
published 4.5
4.21
Leslie Kues
published
4.19
Polly Paulsen
published
4.18
Miki Lenox
published
4.18
Kristine Avila
published
4.16
Liza Geary
published
4.11
Jenifer Hartwell
published
4.08
Hope Neighbor
published 4.5
4.05
Fan Lau
published 4.5
4.00
Jennifer Yeager
published
3.98
Allison Whitten
published 4.5
3.98
Jennifer Dibble
published
3.96
Yukari Seki
published
3.94
Jana Klein
published
3.89
Rachel Gabato
published
3.81
Lilian Kim
published
3.76
Lisa Laanisto
published
Junko Bice
published
Karen MacK
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sueyin Wong + Jennifer Yeager314 matchesnot enough data
Pratima Rao + Irene Otten213 matchesnot enough data
Fan Lau + Yukari Seki303 matchesnot enough data
Miki Lenox + Caroline Iwanchuk213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michaela Zuckova
8W–2L career · no lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
4.49
Sueyin Wong
13W–21L career · no lines in 2025
1%91%8%
4.32
4.5
Clare Badaracco
5W–6L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Caroline Iwanchuk
16W–7L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
4.5
Danielle Daly Sabaris
3W–2L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%4%
4.27
Pratima Rao
3W–5L career · no lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
4.23
4.5
Irene Otten
11W–3L career · no lines in 2025
4%94%2%
4.23
Leslie Kues
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
6%93%1%
4.21
Polly Paulsen
4W–1L career · no lines in 2025
7%92%1%
4.19
Miki Lenox
7W–4L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Kristine Avila
10W–6L career · no lines in 2025
8%91%1%
4.18
Liza Geary
7W–13L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%<1%
4.16
Jenifer Hartwell
5W–4L career · no lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
4.11
4.5
Hope Neighbor
0W–7L career · no lines in 2025
26%74%<1%
4.08
4.5
Fan Lau
4W–8L career · no lines in 2025
35%65%<1%
4.05
Jennifer Yeager
8W–7L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
4.00
4.5
Allison Whitten
6W–1L career · no lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
3.98
Jennifer Dibble
4W–3L career · no lines in 2025
56%44%<1%
3.98
Yukari Seki
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
61%39%<1%
3.96
Jana Klein
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
3.94
Rachel Gabato
2W–15L career · no lines in 2025
<1%80%20%
3.89
Lilian Kim
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
93%7%<1%
3.81
Lisa Laanisto
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
2%95%3%
3.76
Junko Bice
2W–0L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Karen MacK
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.