Teams

SLee/GBuck (OPRC)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

10 players · average NTRP 3.25 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule9 played
2022-05-02vs NBrasch (PCC)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Anna Troppmann2-6, 2-6
2022-04-29vs DMiller (Life Time)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJimena Lozano de Bermudez / Lauren Packman vs Raquel Correa / Susan Cooke1-6, 3-6
2022-04-25vs JChallis/BLindley (Firethorne)Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJimena Lozano de Bermudez / Nannette Markham vs Jennifer Voci / Kristen Petras3-6, 2-6
2022-04-11vs MBell (Charlotte Country Club)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Graye Todd4-6, 1-6
2022-04-04vs AWiethoff (Springfield)Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Kara Ward5-7, 5-7
2022-03-21vs KCox (MPCC)Split 11
L#1 DoublesJosey Waleski / Jennifer Danesis vs Ann Patterson / Courtney McCarthy1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Shanin Russell6-1, 6-4
2022-03-07vs KFerry/KCrosby (Sardis)Split 11
W#1 DoublesGeorgia Buck / Josey Waleski vs Laura Shirey / Lisa Oberer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJimena Lozano de Bermudez / Lauren Packman vs Katie Ferry / Deanna Haynes3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2022-02-28Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Courtney Vilcek7-6, 4-6, 0-1
2022-02-21Lost 01
L#2 SinglesJimena Lozano de Bermudez vs Rachel Lee3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.06 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.83
Katie Haywood
published
3.50
Jennifer Danesis
published 3.5
3.28
Georgia Buck
published 3.5
3.16
Josey Waleski
usually #2 Doubles 46%, also #1 Doubles 27% · published 3.5
3.03
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.99
Anne Schmitt
published 3
2.99
Katie Monson
published
2.67
Casey Beck
published 3
2.66
Nannette Markham
published
2.54
Lauren Packman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jennifer Danesis + Josey Waleski7357% gamesnot enough data
Josey Waleski + Georgia Buck224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Haywood
29W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%89%10%
3.83
3.5
Jennifer Danesis
66W–37L career · no lines in 2022
<1%52%48%
3.50
3.5
Georgia Buck
21W–23L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Josey Waleski
67W–63L career · 11 lines in 2022
12%88%<1%
3.16
3
Jimena Lozano de Bermudez
58W–37L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%41%59%
3.03
3
Anne Schmitt
28W–29L career · no lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
2.99
Katie Monson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2022
54%46%<1%
2.99
3
Casey Beck
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
Nannette Markham
9W–13L career · no lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
2.66
Lauren Packman
6W–19L career · no lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.