Teams

Hayes

Sequoyah Christmas Tournament Flex 18&Over · 18+ Men's 2.5

9 players · average NTRP 2.75 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-12-08vs ChastainLost 12
L#1 DoublesJeff Dittmer / Jonathon Nesbitt vs Brian Hammontree / Joey Still5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDevin Hayes / Adam Woodman vs Brian Chastain / David Locke1-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNick Beddington / Chandler Beddington vs Carlos Rivera / Elvis Garcia7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2024-12-08vs ChastainLost 12
L#1 DoublesAdam Woodman / Richard Morrison vs Scott King / Brian Hammontree1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJonathon Nesbitt / Jeff Dittmer vs Brian Chastain / Joey Still2-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesNick Beddington / Chandler Beddington vs Peyton Chastain / Bradley Mason6-2, 6-4
2024-12-07vs ChastainLost 12
L#1 DoublesRichard Morrison / Lee Carroll vs Brian Hammontree / Michael Hullender3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDevin Hayes / Jonathon Nesbitt vs Brian Chastain / David Locke0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesNick Beddington / James Beddington vs Peyton Chastain / Bradley Mason6-2, 6-1
2024-12-07vs ChastainLost 02
L#1 DoublesAdam Woodman / Richard Morrison vs Brian Chastain / Michael Hullender5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesJonathon Nesbitt / Lee Carroll vs David Locke / Brian Hammontree5-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18+ Men's 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Chastain4093672
2Hayes043919131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.57 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.87
Richard Morrison
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Lee Carroll
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Jonathon Nesbitt
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.47
Adam Woodman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.27
Devin Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Chandler Beddington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
James Beddington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Jeff Dittmer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nick Beddington
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nick Beddington + Chandler Beddington303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Richard Morrison
18W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%84%15%
2.87
Lee Carroll
15W–32L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%88%<1%
2.65
Jonathon Nesbitt
14W–19L career · 4 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
3
Adam Woodman
6W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
3
Devin Hayes
9W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
96%4%<1%
2.27
2.5
Chandler Beddington
4W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
2.5
James Beddington
1W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Jeff Dittmer
7W–8L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Nick Beddington
7W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.