Teams

Fanelli: The Drop Bears

2025 Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.0 Men

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-02-27vs Ramachandran/FolleseWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Fanelli / Fernando Furquim vs Harish Ramachandran / Michael Bingham6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesJoshua Tripeny-Bush vs Lance Gauer4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMike Veater-Fuchs / Brandon Kemboi vs Aaron McCants / Alan Yousha6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesSamuel Limerick / Paul Hoffmann vs Nilakantan Mahadevan / Spencer Follese6-2, 6-4
2025-02-13vs TRETTEL W25Lost 23
W#1 DoublesEli Kramer / Brian Fanelli vs Jeff Johnson / Kresimir Skvorc6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSiddharth Phadke vs Anthony Trettel1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJoshua Tripeny-Bush / Fernando Furquim vs Josh Kasendorf / Zachary Johnson6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 SinglesMax Schumacher vs Michael Malloy6-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesMatt Decuir / Steven sisolak vs Nicolei Nasrabadi / John Thumser6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2025-02-06vs BrooksWon 32
W#1 DoublesEli Kramer / Fernando Furquim vs Anthony Brooks / Max Mlinar6-3, 7-6
L#1 SinglesMike Veater-Fuchs vs Wade Linkert1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBrian Fanelli / Max Schumacher vs Mark Bobnick / Kurt New3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 SinglesSteven sisolak vs Benjamin Hanf4-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesPaul Hoffmann / Matt Decuir vs Paul Hartzell / Jordan McGowan7-5, 2-6, 1-0
2025-01-23vs KalugdanLost 23
L#1 DoublesSteven sisolak / Samuel Limerick vs Edward Rainier Santos / Joseph Kalugdan3-6, 5-7
W#1 SinglesMax Schumacher vs Darwin Yasis6-3, 6-0
L#2 DoublesMike Veater-Fuchs / Joshua Tripeny-Bush vs Nate Hanes / Edward Wu2-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesBrian Fanelli vs Timothy Joson6-2, 6-0
L#3 DoublesSiddharth Phadke / Brandon Kemboi vs Richard Kaung / Rodolfo Dy3-6, 3-6
2025-01-09vs Ramachandran/FolleseWon 32
W#1 DoublesFernando Furquim / Samuel Limerick vs Daniel Poppy / Nilakantan Mahadevan6-3, 6-0
W#1 SinglesJoshua Tripeny-Bush vs David Samuels6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesSteven sisolak / Siddharth Phadke vs Michael Bingham / Arun Mehta2-6, 6-7
L#2 SinglesChris Stehn vs Lance Gauer2-6, 5-7
W#3 DoublesMatt Decuir / Mike Veater-Fuchs vs Alan Yousha / Aaron McCants6-0, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.17
Eli Kramer
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Matt Decuir
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Fernando Furquim
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.98
Brian Fanelli
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.98
Max Schumacher
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.85
Steven sisolak
usually #2 Doubles 25%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
2.83
Joshua Tripeny-Bush
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.78
Samuel Limerick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.73
Chris Stehn
usually #2 Singles 100% · published 3
2.71
Paul Hoffmann
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.33
Brandon Kemboi
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
Mike Veater-Fuchs
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Siddharth Phadke
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Samuel Limerick + Steven sisolak3249% games+2.4% vs expected
Max Schumacher + Chris Stehn3249% games+1.3% vs expected
Brian Fanelli + Matt Decuir404 matchesnot enough data
Max Schumacher + Fernando Furquim123 matchesnot enough data
Fernando Furquim + Eli Kramer303 matchesnot enough data
Brian Fanelli + Eli Kramer303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Eli Kramer
13W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%11%89%
3.17
Matt Decuir
18W–5L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%19%81%
3.12
Fernando Furquim
12W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%47%53%
3.01
3.5
Brian Fanelli
16W–12L career · type A · 4 lines in 2025
55%45%<1%
2.98
Max Schumacher
18W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%55%45%
2.98
Steven sisolak
4W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
Joshua Tripeny-Bush
2W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
89%11%<1%
2.83
Samuel Limerick
10W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%92%5%
2.78
3
Chris Stehn
7W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Paul Hoffmann
5W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
2.71
2.5
Brandon Kemboi
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%89%11%
2.33
Mike Veater-Fuchs
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Siddharth Phadke
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.