Teams

Mesaris/LR/Reb

2024 Mixed 40 & Over · 4.5 Mixed

12 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ARKANSAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-30vs Mesaris2/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarc Heflin / Jennifer Baptist vs Brandon Kiker / Jenni Orahood6-4
W#2 DoublesKaren Koen / Mike Delgado vs Marcie Jeter / Britt Loyd6-2
2024-07-30vs Mesaris2/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 DoublesMarc Heflin / Jennifer Baptist vs Brandon Kiker / Jenni Orahood6-3
W#2 DoublesKaren Koen / Carl Bell vs Marcie Jeter / Britt Loyd6-2
2024-07-24vs Mesaris2/LR/RebWon 20
W#1 DoublesJay Heflin / Suzanne Klug vs Britt Loyd / Dottie Highfill6-2
W#2 DoublesTimothy Giattina / Paula Juels Jones vs Marcie Jeter / Joshua Shemper6-1
2024-07-24vs Mesaris2/LR/RebSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPaula Juels Jones / Timothy Giattina vs Joshua Shemper / Marcie Jeter6-2
L#2 DoublesLee Mesaris / Alexis Freeman vs Brandon Kiker / Jenni Orahood3-6
2024-07-24vs Mesaris2/LR/RebSplit 11
W#1 DoublesJay Heflin / Suzanne Klug vs Britt Loyd / Marcie Jeter6-1
L#2 DoublesKaren Koen / Kirk Bradshaw vs Brandon Kiker / Jenni Orahood1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 4.5 Mixed
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Mesaris/LR/Reb50123335
2Mesaris2/LR/Reb052131382

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Suzanne Klug
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
4.33
Kirk Bradshaw
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.31
Jay Heflin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Alexis Freeman
published 4.5
Carl Bell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.19
Mike Delgado
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.18
Karen Koen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.15
Lee Mesaris
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.07
Jennifer Baptist
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Marc Heflin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paula Juels Jones
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Timothy Giattina
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Koen + Kirk Bradshaw5254% games−5.3% vs expected
Karen Koen + Mike Delgado303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Suzanne Klug
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
4.47
Kirk Bradshaw
16W–4L career · 1 line in 2024
1%90%9%
4.33
Jay Heflin
16W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
4.31
4.5
Alexis Freeman
8W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Carl Bell
7W–1L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Mike Delgado
15W–6L career · 1 line in 2024
7%92%1%
4.19
Karen Koen
33W–8L career · 3 lines in 2024
9%91%1%
4.18
Lee Mesaris
34W–9L career · 1 line in 2024
12%88%<1%
4.15
Jennifer Baptist
22W–22L career · 2 lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
4.07
Marc Heflin
10W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Paula Juels Jones
3W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Timothy Giattina
3W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.