Teams

HOME

2022 USTA ADULT 55 & OVER - ASPEN · MOUNTAINS

11 players · average NTRP 3.25 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2022-06-21vs ASPTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLonetia Gerken / Jamie Stone vs Vivian Williams / Margaret Chiles6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Chipman / Michele Gieg vs Margo Stapleton / TONI COURTENAY6-3, 6-2
2022-06-20vs GSCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesBecky Rockwell / Jamie Stone vs Judith Byrns / Jon Nell Reeds6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesRebecca Asbury / Nancy Wright vs Debbie Birch / Sandy Stoltzfus6-3, 6-4
2022-06-16vs ASPTCWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Cary / BARBARA DOBROT vs TONI COURTENAY / Vivian Williams6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSusan Chipman / Nancy Wright vs Margaret Chiles / Melissa Wilkinson6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMichele Gieg / SHARON STENSON vs Margo Stapleton / Renee Fleisher6-0, 6-0
2022-06-04vs GSCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Cary / BARBARA DOBROT vs Sandy Stoltzfus / Carolyn Strautman6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSHARON STENSON / Becky Rockwell vs Melody Morris / Eva Pekkala6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · MOUNTAINS
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1HOME60171239
2ASPTC0611734206

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

BARBARA DOBROT
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Becky Rockwell
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Julia Watson
published
Lonetia Gerken
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Sue KATZ
published
Michele Gieg
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Nancy Wright
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Asbury
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
SHARON STENSON
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Susan Cary
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Susan Chipman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Michele Gieg + Susan Chipman8263% games+6.8% vs expected
Susan Cary + BARBARA DOBROT5357% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chipman + Nancy Wright5074% gamesnot enough data
Lonetia Gerken + Michele Gieg123 matchesnot enough data
Lonetia Gerken + Nancy Wright123 matchesnot enough data
Michele Gieg + Nancy Wright303 matchesnot enough data
Susan Chipman + SHARON STENSON123 matchesnot enough data
Mary Sue KATZ + Becky Rockwell303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
BARBARA DOBROT
16W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
3
Becky Rockwell
16W–1L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Julia Watson
2W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Lonetia Gerken
10W–7L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Mary Sue KATZ
11W–3L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michele Gieg
15W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Nancy Wright
15W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Asbury
12W–2L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
SHARON STENSON
5W–5L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Cary
13W–6L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Susan Chipman
20W–11L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.