Teams

MBland-CHTC

2026 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening

13 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2026-05-06vs SClausnitzer-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesCHARLES ENDERLINE / Mark Bland vs Jim Brantley / Alex Shattuck2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesErik Milz / Derek Phillips vs Kyle Droppers / Charles Burke0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJohn Hess / Jason Morales vs Patrick Jeffs / Juan Munster0-6, 1-6
2026-04-22vs MLong.M.40-DURWon 20
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / Ed Slanker vs Matthew Davies / Rick Edmunds6-7, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesErik Milz / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Steven Rochkind / Mark Rhoades6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2026-04-01vs MRoach-CHCCWon 21
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Tom Wollman / Richard Fisher6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesErik Milz / Charles Fisher vs Alfred Leach / Aaron Meadows0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesEd Slanker / Derek Phillips vs Philip Gilchrist / David Zvara6-0, 6-0
2026-03-25vs DNagelhout-HSLost 12
L#1 DoublesJason Morales / Ed Slanker vs David Evert / Dave Thomas3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMark Bland / Donald Emmett vs Dirk Kumashiro / Leon Grodski Barrera3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesFranck Seguin / John Hess vs David Nagelhout / DAVID DELINSKY7-5, 6-0
2026-03-18vs AHabib-HRLost 12
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / John Hess vs James Bowers / Michael Klein6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesErik Milz / Derek Phillips vs Ashraf Habib / Tom Luben1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Fisher / Ed Slanker vs BRIAN KING / John Harlow1-6, 0-6
2026-03-11vs SWhitt-UNCLost 12
W#1 DoublesFranck Seguin / Marcelo Straus Takahashi vs Adam Hantman / Richard Jaskot4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPedro Pinto / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Josh Gouker - (DQ) / Christopher Fioretti0-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesCharles Fisher / Donald Emmett vs Robert Miller / Tim Turner2-6, 0-6
2026-03-04vs MLong.M.40-DURWon 30
W#1 DoublesMark Bland / CHARLES ENDERLINE vs Brian Goldman / Mark Rhoades6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesFranck Seguin / Pedro Pinto vs Rick Edmunds / Robert Long0-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesEd Slanker / Derek Phillips vs Bill Schaller / Steven Rochkind5-7, 6-1, 1-0
2026-02-25vs SClausnitzer-CHCCLost 03
L#1 DoublesMark Bland / Pedro Pinto vs Steven Clausnitzer / Jim Brantley1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Hess / Franck Seguin vs Scott Davies / Ryan Bialas4-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesErik Milz / Ed Slanker vs Joey Pointer / Charles Burke4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings6 teams · 40 Over Adult 3.0 Men Evening
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1AHabib-HR7125720215
2SWhitt-UNC44191329251
3MLong.M.40-DUR44122042301
4MBland-CHTC35131943317
5MRoach-CHCC35102246305
6DNagelhout-HS0872552337

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.64 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.89
Mark Bland
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #2 Doubles 14% · published
2.83
CHARLES ENDERLINE
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
John Hess
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.80
Ed Slanker
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.75
Jason Morales
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.71
Bill Stewart
published 3
2.65
Derek Phillips
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.62
Franck Seguin
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.52
Charles Fisher
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.44
Pedro Pinto
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.44
Erik Milz
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.28
Donald Emmett
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
David Gilliam
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gilliam + Franck Seguin134 matchesnot enough data
Mark Bland + CHARLES ENDERLINE314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mark Bland
16W–20L career · 7 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.89
3
CHARLES ENDERLINE
54W–46L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
2.83
John Hess
5W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Ed Slanker
11W–10L career · type S · 6 lines in 2026
1%93%6%
2.80
Jason Morales
3W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Bill Stewart
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Derek Phillips
3W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Franck Seguin
6W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
18%82%<1%
2.62
3
Charles Fisher
5W–11L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
45%55%<1%
2.52
Pedro Pinto
1W–6L career · 3 lines in 2026
67%33%<1%
2.44
3
Erik Milz
2W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
68%32%<1%
2.44
3
Donald Emmett
1W–12L career · 2 lines in 2026
95%5%<1%
2.28
David Gilliam
3W–4L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.