Teams

NNM 4.0M JC - Kunzler

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over League - NNM · 4.0 Men

9 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTHERN NEW MEXICO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2022-04-10vs NNM 4.0M EG - MartinLost 12
W#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs Morgan Gerard6-3, 6-7, 1-0
L#2 DoublesMichael Kent / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Stephen Post / David Dunmar2-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Bruce Burnham vs Mark Wallenbrock / Scot McDermott4-6, 3-6
2022-04-07vs NNM 4.0M HP - GeeWon 31
L#1 DoublesMichael Kent / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Ernesto Victor Jayme / Scott Jamison3-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs Nitish Suvarna6-4, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLiem Nguyen / David Walsh vs Robert Beavis / James Morrow6-2, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Jae Lee vs Greg Fotieo / John Cilke6-1, 6-4
2022-04-04vs NNM 4.0M TCA - GoradiaLost 12
L#1 DoublesLarry Schneider / David Walsh vs Ron Oldfield / Jeff Hellman2-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJae Lee / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Pete Henderson / Jeffrey Hagemann0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesBruce Burnham / Kurt Kunzler vs Greg King / Leon Redman6-4, 6-4
2022-04-03vs NNM 4.0M HP - GeeWon 21
W#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs James Morrow6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Bruce Burnham vs Matthew Armstrong / James Gee6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesWilliam Ambrose / David Walsh vs Robert Beavis / Greg Fotieo2-6, 6-2, 0-1
2022-03-27vs NNM 4.0M VR - OltmansSplit 22
L#1 DoublesMichael Kent / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Joe LeBlanc / William Dukes3-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs Joey Pollom6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Jae Lee vs Matthew Akers / Kevin Wiley4-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesBruce Burnham / Liem Nguyen vs Daniel McClanahan / Douglas Oltmans6-2, 6-3
2022-03-24vs NNM 4.0M VR - OltmansSplit 22
L#1 DoublesWilliam Ambrose / Larry Schneider vs Kevin Wiley / William Dukes3-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs Joe LeBlanc1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHyeung-Sik Jason Min / Michael Kent vs Frank Calabro / Daniel McClanahan6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesKurt Kunzler / Jae Lee vs Tom Knoop / Douglas Oltmans7-6, 7-5
2022-03-13vs NNM 4.0M EG - MartinLost 02
L#1 DoublesDavid Walsh / Larry Schneider vs Peter Martin / Roger Prucino5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesWilliam Ambrose / Hyeung-Sik Jason Min vs Mark Wallenbrock / Stephen Post1-6, 3-6
2022-03-03vs NNM 4.0M TCA - GoradiaLost 13
L#1 DoublesLiam Eom / Michael Kent vs Pete Henderson / Ron Oldfield1-6, 2-6
W#1 SinglesYongseek Kim vs Jeff Hellman6-0, 6-2
L#2 DoublesDavid Walsh / Liem Nguyen vs Leon Redman / Matthew Cone2-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLarry Schneider / William Ambrose vs Greg King / Jeffrey Hagemann2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.67 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

David Walsh
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.75
Yongseek Kim
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.65
Kurt Kunzler
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.64
Hyeung-Sik Jason Min
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.63
Bruce Burnham
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
Larry Schneider
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Liam Eom
published
Michael Kent
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
William Ambrose
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hyeung-Sik Jason Min + Yongseek Kim15656% games+1.1% vs expected
Michael Kent + Hyeung-Sik Jason Min10951% games−0.8% vs expected
Kurt Kunzler + Hyeung-Sik Jason Min4353% games−5.4% vs expected
David Walsh + William Ambrose3347% games−7.9% vs expected
Bruce Burnham + Kurt Kunzler7547% games−8.9% vs expected
Hyeung-Sik Jason Min + William Ambrose134 matchesnot enough data
Bruce Burnham + David Walsh213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
David Walsh
13W–32L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
Yongseek Kim
51W–37L career · 6 lines in 2022
3%95%2%
3.75
Kurt Kunzler
82W–91L career · 6 lines in 2022
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Hyeung-Sik Jason Min
100W–97L career · 6 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.64
4
Bruce Burnham
25W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.63
Larry Schneider
8W–22L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data
Liam Eom
4W–8L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Michael Kent
17W–22L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
William Ambrose
19W–19L career · 4 lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.