Teams

LCTA18/Simes/MPR

USTA 18 & Over Spring · 18 & over Women 3.5 - Day

11 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule11 played
2026-04-21vs LCTA (B) 3.5W 18 & Over (Trost)Lost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Heyl / Elizabeth Walker vs Kristie Gaunt / Annie Warsofsky2-6, 5-7
L#1 SinglesBarbara Branch vs Danna Hendrickson0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline Simes / Caroline Treece vs Bria Williams / Courtney Moskowitz4-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesGrace Schraibman vs Cara Weaver1-6, 0-6
2026-04-16vs LCTA (C) 3.5W 18 & Over (Sass)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Heyl / Elizabeth Walker vs Arden McKenzie / Jennifer Keith3-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Amy Arrington1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatharine Laidlaw / Catherine McMann vs Kady Paradise / Sarah Sass1-6, 1-6
2026-03-26vs LCTA18/Eichelberger/HamlinLost 05
L#1 DoublesKatharine Laidlaw / Catherine McMann vs Kathleen Heffling / MARY HOLTZ3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBarbara Branch vs Emily Jensen1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMadeline Simes / Ashton Kolicko vs Kristin Steele / Mindy Spring1-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesCaroline Treece vs Amie Waldeck1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Brittany Whatley vs Dana Keys / Emily Moore0-6, 2-6
2026-03-19vs LCTA18/Rosenthal/MPRLost 03
L#1 DoublesDana Heyl / Barbara Branch vs Barbara Hines / Bessie Gantt1-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Francine Dumont1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesAshton Kolicko vs Karen Pinosky1-6, 3-6
2026-03-12vs LCTA18/Grimm/LTPDILost 04
L#1 DoublesDana Heyl / Catherine McMann vs Elisabeth Parkinson / Evelyn Young6-7, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Katie Buss0-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Elinor Chapman vs Erin Grimm / Sarah Broad1-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAshton Kolicko vs Mary Blum0-6, 2-6
2026-03-05vs LCTA18/Hornig/MaybankLost 04
L#1 DoublesCatherine McMann / Elizabeth Walker vs Erica Garriss / Erica Thibault0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesCaroline Treece vs Sue Grisanti1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Elinor Chapman vs Allison Soler / Sara Perry0-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesMadeline Simes / Ashton Kolicko vs Julie Hill / Oxana Smith3-6, 3-6
2026-03-02vs LCTA18/Wisner/CCCLost 12
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Mettrie Lari5-7, 5-7
L#2 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Elinor Chapman vs Heather Coleman / Carolyn Freeman0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesAshton Kolicko vs Kristen Cooper3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-26vs LCTA18/ONeill/IONLost 04
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Walker / Dana Heyl vs Kim ONeill / Helen Elliott1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Mary Dalrymple0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Elinor Chapman vs Martha Morris / Meghan Webster0-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesCaroline Treece vs Anna-Liese Anderson5-7, 1-6
2026-02-21vs LCTA18/Whalen/Wild DunesLost 14
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Walker / Dana Heyl vs Brandy Mcmahon / Susan Cangelosi3-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesBarbara Branch vs Chelsea Congdon2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAshton Kolicko / Catherine McMann vs Leslie Bacon / Kimberly Warpula1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Amy West1-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Katharine Laidlaw vs Heather Witheford / Heather Koepenick1-6
2026-02-19vs LCTA18/Staebell/DICLost 04
L#1 DoublesBarbara Branch / Catherine McMann vs Cheryl Baumann / Tara Moynihan1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Jana Upshaw0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDana Heyl / Elizabeth Walker vs Kelly Bellone / Susanna Kopchains3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesAshton Kolicko vs Lisa Amos1-6, 2-6
2026-01-29vs LCTA18/Tunick/Park WestLost 14
L#1 DoublesGrace Schraibman / Elinor Chapman vs Christine Tunick / Alise McCormack1-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesMadeline Simes vs Carly Hara1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDana Heyl / Ashton Kolicko vs Ellen Maguire / Erika Colbrunn4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesCaroline Treece vs MacKenzie Williams2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrittany Whatley / Katharine Laidlaw vs Beverly Mckinley / Andrea Harrison3-6, 7-5, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & over Women 3.5 - Day have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.22
Dana Heyl
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.99
Catherine McMann
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.89
Barbara Branch
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.77
Katharine Laidlaw
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
2.71
Grace Schraibman
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
2.71
Elinor Chapman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.67
Madeline Simes
usually #1 Singles 74%, also #3 Doubles 11% · published
2.66
Ashton Kolicko
usually #1 Doubles 36%, also #2 Singles 29% · published 3
2.59
Sherry Tibbs
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
2.53
Caroline Treece
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3
2.49
Brittany Whatley
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Elinor Chapman + Grace Schraibman056% games−31.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dana Heyl
12W–27L career · 8 lines in 2026
4%94%2%
3.22
3.5
Catherine McMann
2W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
3.5
Barbara Branch
25W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
80%20%<1%
2.89
Katharine Laidlaw
10W–21L career · 4 lines in 2026
2%94%4%
2.77
3.5
Grace Schraibman
0W–8L career · type S · 8 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.71
3.5
Elinor Chapman
0W–5L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
99%1%<1%
2.71
Madeline Simes
19W–22L career · 19 lines in 2026
10%89%1%
2.67
3
Ashton Kolicko
6W–15L career · 14 lines in 2026
11%88%<1%
2.66
Sherry Tibbs
4W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
25%75%<1%
2.59
3
Caroline Treece
14W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
41%59%<1%
2.53
3
Brittany Whatley
10W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
53%47%<1%
2.49

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.