Teams

JTC - Madorsky

2023 Alachua Combo 50 & Over · 6.5 Women 50+

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_2

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-12-01vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnita Frankenberger / Lisa Booth vs Jennifer Halinski / Lisa King7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Silvia Menendez vs M Cathy Kasweck / Maria Zaldivar6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesChrista Arnold / Michelle Burns vs Terri Lowery / Jodi Cox1-6, 2-6
2023-11-19vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnita Frankenberger / Michelle Burns vs Terri Lowery / Davette Wycoff6-3, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChrista Arnold / Julia Morrisroe vs Jennine Brandt / Colleen Anderson6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesCandis Aurora Wiggins / Silvia Menendez vs Jennifer Halinski / Lisa King7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2023-11-12vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WWon 21
L#1 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Lisa Booth vs Cindy McManus / Raksha Ramkissoon5-7, 7-5, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSilvia Menendez / Julia Morrisroe vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald / Linda Sheehan6-4, 6-4
W#3 DoublesMichelle Burns / Christa Arnold vs Maria Zaldivar / Marisa McLeod6-3, 6-3
2023-11-05vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WLost 12
W#1 DoublesLisa Booth / Anita Frankenberger vs Linda Sheehan / Marisa McLeod3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Jill Shea vs Vicki Johnson / Melinda Hartline1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesMickie Anderson / Kjerstin Terry vs Kim Magee / Davette Wycoff2-6, 0-6
2023-10-29vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WLost 03
L#1 DoublesSilvia Menendez / Mickie Anderson vs Davette Wycoff / Kim Magee0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesMichelle Burns / Jennifer Bogle vs Genne' DeHenau McDonald / Jodi Cox3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesAnita Frankenberger / Quynn Gingrich vs Colleen Anderson / Jennine Brandt6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2023-10-15vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WLost 12
W#1 DoublesIrina Madorsky / Lisa Booth vs Terri Lowery / Raksha Ramkissoon6-2, 7-5
L#2 DoublesMarlene Townsend / Julia Morrisroe vs Vicki Johnson / Melinda Hartline4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesCandis Aurora Wiggins / Quynn Gingrich vs Cindy McManus / Davette Wycoff4-6, 3-6
2023-10-08vs ALACHUA/Dell/6.5Combo50+WLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulia Morrisroe / Marlene Townsend vs Melinda Hartline / Marisa McLeod7-6, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLisa Booth / Irina Madorsky vs Cindy McManus / M Cathy Kasweck3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJennifer Bogle / Jill Shea vs Gina Dell / Davette Wycoff3-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 6.5 Women 50+ have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.14 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.42
Irina Madorsky
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.34
Christa Arnold
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.29
Marlene Townsend
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Anita Frankenberger
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.24
Lisa Booth
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.14
Julia Morrisroe
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.09
Candis Aurora Wiggins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.07
Michelle Burns
published
2.99
Jennifer Bogle
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.97
Kjerstin Terry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.89
Mickie Anderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Silvia Menendez
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Mickie Anderson + Irina Madorsky5259% gamesnot enough data
Julia Morrisroe + Irina Madorsky3349% gamesnot enough data
Julia Morrisroe + Marlene Townsend3251% gamesnot enough data
Anita Frankenberger + Kjerstin Terry134 matchesnot enough data
Anita Frankenberger + Mickie Anderson314 matchesnot enough data
Anita Frankenberger + Candis Aurora Wiggins213 matchesnot enough data
Anita Frankenberger + Marlene Townsend123 matchesnot enough data
Marlene Townsend + Irina Madorsky123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Irina Madorsky
222W–180L career · 5 lines in 2023
72%28%<1%
3.42
3.5
Christa Arnold
271W–143L career · 6 lines in 2023
1%86%13%
3.34
Marlene Townsend
181W–153L career · 6 lines in 2023
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Anita Frankenberger
68W–66L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Lisa Booth
168W–85L career · 5 lines in 2023
4%92%3%
3.24
Julia Morrisroe
119W–94L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.14
3.5
Candis Aurora Wiggins
49W–51L career · 2 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.09
Michelle Burns
26W–9L career · no lines in 2023
<1%30%70%
3.07
Jennifer Bogle
34W–86L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%52%48%
2.99
Kjerstin Terry
26W–48L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%58%42%
2.97
3
Mickie Anderson
103W–99L career · 2 lines in 2023
<1%78%22%
2.89
Silvia Menendez
4W–5L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.