Teams

Heritage Bay - Barger

2023 Collier Combo 18 & Over Spring · 7.5 Women - Spring

13 players · average NTRP 3.72 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#1 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Brenda Rhoda vs Dina Viteretti / Susan Julich6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJennifer Brown / Shelley Boggess vs Suzanne Messere / Stephanie Opel3-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCheryl Comes / Diana Pleeter vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2023-05-30vs Marco YMCA - J. BallWon 21
W#1 DoublesCheryl Comes / Shelley Boggess vs Mary Mastrogiacomo / Renee Facciola7-5, 6-1
W#2 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Natalie Cortese vs Ann Heinauer / Julie Kastholm4-6, 7-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMary Varilek / Carla Klumpp vs Shirley Steffen / Donna Digeronimo3-6, 1-6
W#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Natalie Cortese vs Dina Viteretti / Terry Dirr3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesJennifer Brown / Carla Klumpp vs Marianne Khayat / Susan Julich4-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSunny Barger / Susie Beaudet vs Bernadette DiPino / Donna Curry5-7, 4-6
2023-05-04vs Marco YMCA - J. BallLost 12
L#1 DoublesShelley Boggess / Cheryl Rauch vs Ann Heinauer / Julie Kastholm2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLauren Keillor / Susan Flagg vs Susanna Haedelt / Soraya Seirafi1-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBrenda Rhoda / Susie Beaudet vs Jennifer Ball / Shirley Steffen4-6, 3-6
2023-04-27vs Spring Winners/ Marco YMCA - WashakSplit 11
L#1 DoublesDiana Pleeter / Jennifer Brown vs Cheryl Solimine / Dina Viteretti2-6, 7-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSunny Barger / Susie Beaudet vs Deb Dorsey / Brita Swanson6-2, 7-6
2023-04-13vs Marco YMCA - J. BallWon 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Flagg / Carla Klumpp vs Julie Klare / Linda Keely6-4, 6-2
W#2 DoublesCheryl Rauch / Diana Pleeter vs Ann Heinauer / Jeanette Thevening6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesShelley Boggess / Mary Varilek vs Karen Crines / Soraya Seirafi6-4, 6-2
W#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Cheryl Comes vs Marianne Khayat / Jacqueline Heise6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesSusan Flagg / Lauren Keillor vs Deb Dorsey / Brita Swanson5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCarla Klumpp / Cynthia Scariati vs Dina Viteretti / Bridget Smagala1-6, 4-6
2023-03-23vs Marco YMCA - J. BallLost 12
L#1 DoublesSunny Barger / Jennifer Brown vs Ann Heinauer / Julie Kastholm3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSusan Flagg / Brenda Rhoda vs Karen Crines / Renee Facciola1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSusie Beaudet / Natalie Cortese vs Dana Sacks / Lauren Hattenbach6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.5 Women - Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.48 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.74
Diana Pleeter
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.67
Carla Klumpp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.64
Sunny Barger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.61
Karen Hole
published 4
3.59
Shelley Boggess
usually #3 Doubles 36%, also #1 Doubles 36% · published
3.52
Natalie Cortese
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.47
Brenda Rhoda
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.46
Susan Flagg
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.37
Susie Beaudet
published
3.33
Mary Varilek
published
3.33
Lauren Keillor
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.25
Cheryl Rauch
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.23
Cheryl Comes
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Carla Klumpp + Shelley Boggess3459% games+18.5% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Sunny Barger495049% games+3.5% vs expected
Susan Flagg + Lauren Keillor121453% games+0.4% vs expected
Carla Klumpp + Sunny Barger131547% games−4.4% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Lauren Keillor101149% games−5.1% vs expected
Diana Pleeter + Lauren Keillor191450% games−6.4% vs expected
Brenda Rhoda + Karen Hole6753% gamesnot enough data
Sunny Barger + Diana Pleeter10261% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Diana Pleeter
139W–84L career · 5 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.74
4
Carla Klumpp
99W–93L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.67
4
Sunny Barger
206W–211L career · 4 lines in 2023
16%84%1%
3.64
4
Karen Hole
99W–147L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.61
Shelley Boggess
191W–176L career · 11 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.59
3.5
Natalie Cortese
144W–71L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%43%57%
3.52
3.5
Brenda Rhoda
141W–148L career · 3 lines in 2023
<1%59%41%
3.47
Susan Flagg
90W–68L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%60%40%
3.46
Susie Beaudet
19W–6L career · no lines in 2023
<1%82%17%
3.37
Mary Varilek
10W–8L career · no lines in 2023
1%88%12%
3.33
3.5
Lauren Keillor
161W–184L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%88%11%
3.33
3.5
Cheryl Rauch
106W–90L career · 2 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.25
3.5
Cheryl Comes
11W–7L career · no lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.