Teams

Clarke

2021 40&Over Mixed · 6.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.56 / WESTERN REGION

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-08-27vs SYR: Leuenberger/PriceLost 02
L#1 DoublesFenghua Li / Ping Deng vs Satyajit Marawar / Kim Waale4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#2 DoublesFatma Sonmez-Leopold / Thomas Ryan vs Greg May / Juliet Concilla5-7, 4-6
2021-08-20vs Geary-DrumlinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesPing Deng / Fenghua Li vs Brian Bush / Emily Vacher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesThomas Ryan / PAMELA WELLS vs Renee de Nevers / Weiqiang Dong4-6, 0-6
2021-08-16vs SYR: Leuenberger/PriceLost 02
L#1 DoublesFenghua Li / Ping Deng vs Richard Price / Maiken Westergaard3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 DoublesThomas Ryan / Andrea Elliott vs Greg May / Juliet Concilla4-6, 2-6
2021-07-30vs Geary-DrumlinsSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMichael Leopold / Heidi Howard vs Brian Bush / Young Jensen6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesPaul McMurtrie / PAMELA WELLS vs Allyson Mead / Kenneth Geary1-6, 3-6
2021-07-16vs SYR: Leuenberger/PriceLost 12
W#1 DoublesMichael Leopold / Fatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Juliet Concilla / Prashant Deshmane6-2, 6-1
L#2 DoublesJack Clarkson / Michele Kellish vs John Bonaccio / Nicole Christina6-3, 2-2
L#3 DoublesPAMELA WELLS / Paul McMurtrie vs Greg May / Mary Hagemann4-6, 2-6
2021-07-09vs Geary-DrumlinsLost 12
L#1 DoublesPing Deng / Fenghua Li vs Kenneth Geary / Allyson Mead6-1, 0-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesHeidi Howard / Donald Trombley vs Brian Bush / Young Jensen3-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesMichele Kellish / Thomas Ryan vs Renee de Nevers / Weiqiang Dong6-0, 6-1
2021-06-18vs SYR: Leuenberger/PriceWon 21
W#1 DoublesMichael Leopold / Fatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Richard Price / Maiken Westergaard6-0, 6-4
L#2 DoublesThomas Ryan / Donna Hack vs John Bonaccio / Nicole Christina6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesJack Clarkson / Andrea Elliott vs Satyajit Marawar / Juliet Concilla4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2021-06-11vs Geary-DrumlinsWon 21
L#1 DoublesDonna Hack / Donald Trombley vs Alison Brzenchek / Brian Bush3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesPing Deng / Fenghua Li vs Kenneth Geary / Emily Vacher2-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMichael Leopold / Fatma Sonmez-Leopold vs Weiqiang Dong / Allyson Mead4-6, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings3 teams · 6.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1SYR: Leuenberger/Price7118620196
2Geary-Drumlins35101432217
3Clarke2681636222

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.26 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.90
Michael Leopold
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.63
Richard Ingraham
published 3.5
3.48
Fenghua Li
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.45
Michele Kellish
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.32
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.29
Donna Hack
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.29
Heidi Howard
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.24
Andrea Elliott
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.91
Valerie Clarke
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Jack Clarkson
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
2.61
Ping Deng
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
PAMELA WELLS
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Paul McMurtrie
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Fatma Sonmez-Leopold + Michael Leopold15660% games+8.3% vs expected
Ping Deng + Fenghua Li4649% games−5.3% vs expected
Heidi Howard + Richard Ingraham5164% gamesnot enough data
Donna Hack + Richard Ingraham303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Michael Leopold
81W–22L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%77%23%
3.90
3.5
Richard Ingraham
134W–41L career · no lines in 2021
<1%16%84%
3.63
3.5
Fenghua Li
63W–31L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%58%42%
3.48
Michele Kellish
21W–6L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%64%36%
3.45
3.5
Fatma Sonmez-Leopold
70W–66L career · 4 lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Donna Hack
101W–63L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Heidi Howard
101W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Andrea Elliott
73W–59L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
3.24
Valerie Clarke
71W–74L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%75%25%
2.91
3.5
Jack Clarkson
1W–12L career · type S · 2 lines in 2021
97%3%<1%
2.75
Ping Deng
36W–54L career · 5 lines in 2021
21%79%<1%
2.61
PAMELA WELLS
11W–10L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Paul McMurtrie
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.