Teams

Over Served

SATA Friday Fun League · 3.0 Women

9 players · average NTRP 2.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-06-26vs Double TroubleLost 01
L#1 DoublesEmily Dyess / Jacqueline St Germain vs Joan Millwater / Lisa Moore1-6, 0-6
2026-06-19vs SkyballLost 01
L#2 DoublesJacqueline St Germain / Cecilia Sanchez vs Angela Sandidge / Jill Fox2-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.36 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.08
Stephanie Hankins
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.34
Veronica Adams
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Emily Dyess
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.32
Alice Evans
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.27
Megan Pentecost
published
2.24
Kelsey McManus
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.23
Cecilia Sanchez
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.11
Reghann Purcell
published
Kristen Olfers
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Stephanie Hankins
59W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%28%72%
3.08
Veronica Adams
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2026
0%87%13%
2.34
Emily Dyess
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
0%90%10%
2.32
2.5
Alice Evans
6W–8L career · 1 line in 2026
0%91%9%
2.32
Megan Pentecost
5W–6L career · no lines in 2026
0%95%5%
2.27
Kelsey McManus
3W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Cecilia Sanchez
6W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
0%97%3%
2.23
Reghann Purcell
4W–7L career · no lines in 2026
0%>99%<1%
2.11
Kristen Olfers
1W–0L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.