Teams

NEGTA/Renee Bullard

2025 NEGTA USTA Adult 65 & Over - Spring · 3.5 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.33 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2025-06-23vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenda Burke / Denise Fulton vs Elizabeth Causey / Judy Hyde6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesLa Rue Gastley / Jennie Vaughan vs Mary Casper / Terri Smiley3-6, 4-3
W#3 DoublesRenee Bullard / Jeanne Lewis vs Sharon Hortenstine / Dancy Wynne6-4
2025-06-16vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesBrenda Burke / Denise Fulton vs Barbara Griffeth / Ann Nixon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLa Rue Gastley / Jennie Vaughan vs Elizabeth Causey / Judy Hyde6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeanne Lewis / Karen Sullivan vs Janice Johnson / Betsy Morris6-1, 6-3
2025-06-09vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonWon 21
W#1 DoublesBrenda Burke / Denise Fulton vs Judy Hyde / Janice Johnson6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLa Rue Gastley / Jennie Vaughan vs Barbara Griffeth / Ann Nixon6-3, 7-5
L#3 DoublesKeri Beck / Karen Sullivan vs Elizabeth Causey / Terri Smiley2-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-06-02vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonWon 21
L#1 DoublesWanda Beard / Karen Sullivan vs Ann Nixon / Dancy Wynne2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLa Rue Gastley / Jennie Vaughan vs Mary Casper / Terri Smiley6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesJeanne Lewis / Donna Matthews vs Elizabeth Causey / Judy Hyde6-4, 7-6
2025-05-22vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesDonna Matthews / Wanda Beard vs Ann Nixon / Dancy Wynne3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesRenee Bullard / Jeanne Lewis vs Mary Casper / Barbara Griffeth2-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBonnie Sikorski / Denise Fulton vs Janice Johnson / Lisa Lancaster6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2025-05-15vs NEGTA/Janice JohnsonLost 12
L#1 DoublesWanda Beard / Donna Matthews vs Ann Nixon / Barbara Griffeth4-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDenise Fulton / Jeanne Lewis vs Mary Casper / Terri Smiley7-6, 0-3
L#3 DoublesHelen Minor / Bonnie Sikorski vs Dancy Wynne / Betsy Morris3-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1NEGTA/Renee Bullard4211716153
2NEGTA/Janice Johnson2471124172

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.98 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.28
Denise Fulton
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Brenda Burke
published 3.5
3.14
La Rue Gastley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.12
Jennie Vaughan
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.11
Jeanne Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
3.05
Suzanne Lehman
published
3.05
Helen Minor
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Wanda Beard
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.98
Renee Bullard
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.92
Donna Matthews
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.85
Bonnie Sikorski
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.75
Keri Beck
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.53
Della Twite
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Suzanne Lehman + Brenda Burke6069% games+8.6% vs expected
Renee Bullard + Jeanne Lewis4549% games+3.3% vs expected
Bonnie Sikorski + Della Twite5553% games+1.8% vs expected
La Rue Gastley + Renee Bullard3249% gamesnot enough data
Wanda Beard + Donna Matthews1441% gamesnot enough data
La Rue Gastley + Jennie Vaughan314 matchesnot enough data
Renee Bullard + Jennie Vaughan314 matchesnot enough data
Jeanne Lewis + Della Twite123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Fulton
58W–68L career · 5 lines in 2025
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Brenda Burke
24W–8L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
La Rue Gastley
13W–10L career · 4 lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.14
Jennie Vaughan
26W–20L career · 4 lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.12
Jeanne Lewis
40W–57L career · 5 lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.11
Suzanne Lehman
14W–21L career · no lines in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
3.5
Helen Minor
29W–21L career · 1 line in 2025
34%66%<1%
3.05
Wanda Beard
30W–53L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%50%50%
3.00
Renee Bullard
68W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98
3.5
Donna Matthews
37W–66L career · 3 lines in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
3
Bonnie Sikorski
76W–83L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%88%12%
2.85
Keri Beck
10W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Della Twite
15W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
41%59%<1%
2.53

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.