Teams

V - Wood Ranch Dukes

2023 USTA Adult 40 &Over - Ventura WE · V - Men 4.0

9 players · average NTRP 3.67 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-03-26vs V - Mission Oaks FirecrackersLost 02
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Peter Heinbecker vs Jim He / Jose Mendoza2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesJason Pivnik / Rod Shimamoto vs Michael Vu / Bradley Johnson2-6, 1-6
2023-02-19vs V - Mission Oaks WarriorsWon 10
W#2 DoublesMel Johnson / Jason Pivnik vs Matt Hurley / Steven Murata6-3, 6-4
2023-02-04vs V - Camino CrewSplit 11
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Jeff Sutterman vs Rob Brower / Harry Mapanda0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesJason Pivnik / Mark Barrington vs Michael Garland / Chris Bourne6-2, 3-6, 1-0
2023-01-29vs V - Las Posas Tennis AficionadosLost 01
L#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Darren Chu vs Winston Deardorff / Samuel Pacheco6-1, 1-6, 0-1
2023-01-21vs V - Sunset Hills Mean MachineWon 20
W#1 DoublesGaren Amirganian / Peter Heinbecker vs Earl Schwartz / Patrick Um6-1, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKevin Humfreville / Jason Pivnik vs Louis Ashamallah / Dennis Sly6-3, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for V - Men 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.41 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.81
Darren Chu
published 4
3.62
Peter Heinbecker
published
3.55
Kevin Humfreville
published
3.50
Garen Amirganian
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.45
Jason Pivnik
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.25
Rod Shimamoto
published
3.16
Mel Johnson
published
2.95
Jay Idea
published
Jeff Sutterman
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jason Pivnik + Garen Amirganian7849% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Darren Chu
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
1%90%8%
3.81
Peter Heinbecker
6W–18L career · no lines in 2023
21%79%<1%
3.62
Kevin Humfreville
4W–8L career · no lines in 2023
36%64%<1%
3.55
3.5
Garen Amirganian
217W–148L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%51%49%
3.50
3.5
Jason Pivnik
32W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%65%35%
3.45
Rod Shimamoto
5W–6L career · no lines in 2023
3%93%4%
3.25
Mel Johnson
12W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%13%87%
3.16
Jay Idea
2W–8L career · no lines in 2023
63%37%<1%
2.95
Jeff Sutterman
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.