Teams

Hayes/Murfreesboro

2026 Mixed 55 & Over- Murfreesboro · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over

12 players · average NTRP 3.88 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-21vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 12
W#1 DoublesLoralie Liggett / Daniel Hayes vs Jan Phanthalangsy / John Kinard6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesChristine Cowan / Yale Riley vs Thomas Goodwyn / Sally Wrather4-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesKathleen Malchow / Scott Huie vs Brenda Monajjem / Carl Ragland4-6, 3-6
2026-07-19vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 03
L#1 DoublesSteve Smith / Christine Cowan vs Carl Ragland / Brenda Monajjem2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Loralie Liggett vs Frank Drowota / Collier Andress Smith6-4, 3-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Scott Huie vs Sally Wrather / Thomas Goodwyn6-2, 4-6, 0-1
2026-07-18vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 12
W#1 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Scott Huie vs Frank Drowota / Collier Andress Smith3-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLoralie Liggett / Daniel Hayes vs John Kinard / Jennifer Kelley3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Steve Smith vs Anselm Wishing / Jan Phanthalangsy6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2026-06-16vs Wishing/MurfreesboroSplit 11
W#1 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Daniel Hayes vs Joy Owens / Oliver Owens6-1, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristine Cowan / Yale Riley vs Jennifer Kelley / John Kinard2-6, 3-6
2026-06-07vs Wishing/MurfreesboroWon 21
W#1 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Norman Moore vs T Scott Baker / Karen Corn6-2, 7-6
W#2 DoublesDaniel Hayes / Loralie Liggett vs Sally Wrather / Thomas Goodwyn1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesSteve Smith / Ann Frantz vs Joy Owens / Oliver Owens3-6, 3-6
2026-06-06vs Wishing/MurfreesboroLost 12
L#1 DoublesKathleen Malchow / Randall Malchow vs Collier Andress Smith / Frank Drowota2-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesTammy Jirjis / Ray Brown vs Jennifer Kelley / John Kinard6-4, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesCindy Mccullough / Steve Smith vs Karen Corn / T Scott Baker6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · 4.0 Mixed 55 & Over
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Hayes/Murfreesboro1561227183

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.69 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.82
Tammy Jirjis
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.82
Cindy Mccullough
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Daniel Hayes
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.79
Scott Huie
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Christine Cowan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.71
Loralie Liggett
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.70
Kathleen Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.69
Ray Brown
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.65
Yale Riley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Norman Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.33
Ann Frantz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Randall Malchow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christine Cowan + Yale Riley0738% gamesnot enough data
Daniel Hayes + Loralie Liggett4351% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Tammy Jirjis
18W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%89%10%
3.82
4
Cindy Mccullough
39W–31L career · 2 lines in 2026
1%89%9%
3.82
4
Daniel Hayes
11W–6L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%90%8%
3.81
Scott Huie
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
3.79
4
Christine Cowan
0W–9L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
4%93%3%
3.74
Loralie Liggett
19W–23L career · 4 lines in 2026
7%91%2%
3.71
Kathleen Malchow
12W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.70
Ray Brown
2W–3L career · 1 line in 2026
9%90%1%
3.69
Yale Riley
6W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
3.65
Norman Moore
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ann Frantz
14W–14L career · 1 line in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Randall Malchow
1W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.