Teams

Keaney 18 3.0W Singles Sunday

2025 Piedmont Singles 18 · 3.0 Women Singles Sun

6 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-08-03vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesRachel Mohorn vs Kate Augustine1-6, 1-6
L#2 SinglesJill Phelps vs Misty Hilliard1-6, 0-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Shannon Smith6-1, 7-5
W#1 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Cozetta Gaines6-2, 6-3
W#2 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Kylie Roy6-3, 6-3
W#3 SinglesCatherine Martin vs Graceanne Schuster6-1, 6-2
W#2 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Sammie Jo McCluskey6-2, 6-3
L#3 SinglesAllison Aldridge vs Catherine Johnstone4-6, 5-7
2025-06-29vs Olalere 18+ 3.0W Singles SundayLost 12
L#1 SinglesCatherine Martin vs Kate Augustine1-6, 1-6
W#2 SinglesRachel Mohorn vs Shannon Smith6-2, 4-6, 1-0
L#3 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Shelly Tuhro6-2, 0-6, 0-1
W#1 SinglesAlexa Smith vs Nancy Stoddard6-0, 6-0
W#3 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Sydney Wittman6-4, 6-2
W#1 SinglesRachel Mohorn vs Graceanne Schuster6-1, 6-2
L#2 SinglesJill Phelps vs Suki Gutierrez4-6, 1-6
L#3 SinglesCatherine Martin vs Kylie Roy0-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesCackie Marsh vs Katie Breeding4-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women Singles Sun have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.91 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.14
Alexa Smith
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.94
Catherine Martin
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.84
Allison Aldridge
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3
Cackie Marsh
usually #3 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published 3
2.71
Jill Phelps
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Rachel Mohorn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Allison Aldridge + Alexa Smith123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Alexa Smith
31W–20L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%15%85%
3.14
3
Catherine Martin
7W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%67%32%
2.94
3
Allison Aldridge
5W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%89%10%
2.84
3
Cackie Marsh
3W–4L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jill Phelps
2W–29L career · 2 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.71
Rachel Mohorn
5W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.