Teams

LA - HitWomen

2024 SoCal Doubles - LA · LA - Women 4.5

22 players · average NTRP 4.41 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2024-11-02vs LA - Slay All DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesLaura del Beccaro / Susan Miller vs Jinna Johnson / Chandler Nguyen5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesGloria Geller / Carrie Haber vs Chi Rauen / Demi Dang5-7, 1-6
2024-10-19vs LA-LLW-Alley Cats-Lauren HummelSplit 11
L#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Julie Juliani vs Emma Silber / Dina Vilardo5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMonica Johnson / Gloria Geller vs Cynthia Chou / Lauren DiFazio6-2, 6-3
2024-10-13vs LA - Slay All DayLost 01
L#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Maria de Carvalho vs April Hartstein / Linda Park3-6, 1-6
2024-10-05vs LA - Team AllisonWon 21
L#1 DoublesAB Young / Sona Arutyunyan vs Mimi Kahn / Marion Galliford1-6, 4-5
W#2 DoublesMary Soto / Karen Hankinson vs Chloe Kishel / JANE CHUN7-6, 6-2
W#3 DoublesMaria de Carvalho / Laura del Beccaro vs Michele Quan / Ayanna Maharry6-0, 6-4
2024-09-29vs LA-LLW-Alley Cats-Lauren HummelLost 02
L#1 DoublesKaren Hankinson / Julie Juliani vs Brynna Pietz / Diana Angell3-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesGloria Geller / Maria de Carvalho vs Lisa Novajosky / Lauren DiFazio1-6, 1-6
2024-09-21vs LA - Slay All DayLost 02
L#1 DoublesFelicity Flesher / Gloria Geller vs Linda Park / Christina Catipay7-5, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesLaura del Beccaro / Carrie Kisker vs Yuri Nichelson / Lauren Nicole Finke2-6, 4-6
2024-09-19vs LA-LLW-Alley Cats-Lauren HummelLost 01
L#2 DoublesGloria Geller / Felicity Flesher vs Lisa Novajosky / Maggie Dudeck3-6, 1-6
2024-09-15vs LA - Team AllisonWon 10
W#1 DoublesGloria Geller / Karen Hankinson vs Mimi Kahn / Susie Shoop6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for LA - Women 4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.95 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.36
Karen Hankinson
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.29
Laura del Beccaro
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.28
Alexia Monti
published 4.5
Carrie Haber
published 4.5
4.22
Felicity Flesher
published
4.16
Nicole Buckland
published
4.16
Maria de Carvalho
published
4.15
Gloria Geller
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.14
Sona Arutyunyan
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Mary Soto
published
4.02
Alana Prisco
published 4.5
3.99
Carrie Kisker
published 4.5
3.95
Joanna Ku
published
3.94
AB Young
published 4
3.90
Cindy Suby
published 4.5
3.70
Lisa Kusayanagi
published 4
3.66
Kristen Reut
published
3.64
Phyllis Crotty
published
3.60
Julie Blackwell
published
2.74
Susan Moreno
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Julie Juliani
published
Loretta Peng
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Karen Hankinson + Maria de Carvalho4255% games+2.8% vs expected
Karen Hankinson + Gloria Geller314 matchesnot enough data
Maria de Carvalho + Gloria Geller123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Karen Hankinson
131W–70L career · 5 lines in 2024
1%84%15%
4.36
4.5
Laura del Beccaro
68W–44L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
4.29
4.5
Alexia Monti
7W–2L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
4.28
4.5
Carrie Haber
1W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Felicity Flesher
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
4.22
Nicole Buckland
5W–5L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
Maria de Carvalho
9W–11L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
4.5
Gloria Geller
139W–102L career · 6 lines in 2024
14%85%1%
4.15
4.5
Sona Arutyunyan
174W–87L career · 9 lines in 2024
15%84%1%
4.14
Mary Soto
3W–5L career · no lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
4.06
4.5
Alana Prisco
12W–5L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
4.02
4.5
Carrie Kisker
6W–7L career · no lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
3.99
Joanna Ku
8W–8L career · no lines in 2024
<1%63%37%
3.95
4
AB Young
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
<1%67%33%
3.94
4.5
Cindy Suby
1W–6L career · no lines in 2024
76%24%<1%
3.90
4
Lisa Kusayanagi
46W–42L career · no lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.70
Kristen Reut
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
13%86%1%
3.66
Phyllis Crotty
2W–7L career · no lines in 2024
16%84%1%
3.64
Julie Blackwell
10W–12L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
3.60
Susan Moreno
26W–57L career · 2 lines in 2024
97%3%<1%
2.74
Julie Juliani
4W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Loretta Peng
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.