Teams

GEPTA-3.0-Adult/W(Arriola)(EPTC#1)

SouthernNewMexico · 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE

13 players · average NTRP 3.17 / GEPTA

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2023-09-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesHannah MacIas / Esther Fierro vs Susan Daw / Cathy Castro6-4, 7-5
2023-08-26Lost 01
L#2 DoublesEsther Fierro / Kati Hunyadi vs Celia Al-Tahan / Lourdes Olivas4-6, 1-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2024 USA FALL ADULT 18 & OVER LEAGUE have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.79 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

ALMA HERRERA
usually #1 Singles 42%, also #1 Doubles 19% · published 3.5
2.79
Flor Tovar
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 23% · published 3
Hannah MacIas
usually #1 Singles 38%, also #2 Singles 38% · published 3
Annette Hoy
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Esther Fierro
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Kati Hunyadi
usually #2 Doubles 43%, also #1 Doubles 37% · published
Laura Odell
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 21% · published
Leidiana Baca
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 38% · published
Michele Zerah
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 25% · published
Monica de la Torre
usually #2 Doubles 47%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published
Patricia Arreola
usually #3 Doubles 35%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Roosa Yloenen
usually #2 Singles 46%, also #2 Doubles 27% · published
Ruthann Ordaz
usually #3 Doubles 64%, also #2 Doubles 18% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica de la Torre + Patricia Arreola61145% games−7.1% vs expected
Kati Hunyadi + Flor Tovar11359% gamesnot enough data
Monica de la Torre + Laura Odell5549% gamesnot enough data
Monica de la Torre + Kati Hunyadi4262% gamesnot enough data
Michele Zerah + Ruthann Ordaz3351% gamesnot enough data
Laura Odell + Patricia Arreola2440% gamesnot enough data
Leidiana Baca + Ruthann Ordaz2346% gamesnot enough data
Leidiana Baca + Laura Odell404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
ALMA HERRERA
23W–15L career · 29 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Flor Tovar
22W–19L career · 21 lines in 2024
1%93%6%
2.79
3
Hannah MacIas
10W–12L career · 8 lines in 2024
not enough data
Annette Hoy
7W–9L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Esther Fierro
65W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Kati Hunyadi
74W–65L career · 51 lines in 2024
not enough data
Laura Odell
52W–43L career · 13 lines in 2024
not enough data
Leidiana Baca
23W–34L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Michele Zerah
13W–47L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Monica de la Torre
40W–41L career · 17 lines in 2024
not enough data
Patricia Arreola
47W–63L career · 16 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roosa Yloenen
4W–7L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data
Ruthann Ordaz
34W–33L career · 11 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.