Teams

TCU RUIZ

2026 FW Ladies 55 & Over winter · Sat 9.0 Ladies

14 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-24vs TCU ROSE-MUNOZLost 12
L#1 DoublesSamantha McCartan / Marnie Pizzitola vs Celesta Caldwell / Erin Piel2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesSandy Beasley / Teresa Albus vs Livene Rose-Munoz / Lois Fowler3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesYvonne Wilson / Amy Yeager vs Kalisha Lee / Linda Gleason4-6, 7-5, 1-0
2026-01-17vs TCU ROSE-MUNOZLost 03
L#1 DoublesAmy Yeager / Yvonne Wilson vs Cherrie Ibbott / Celesta Caldwell5-7, 3-6
L#2 DoublesAndra Ruiz / Suzanne Ortolano vs Livene Rose-Munoz / Kalisha Lee4-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKimberly Grogan / Teresa Albus vs Linda Gleason / Trava Smith4-6, 6-7
2026-01-10vs TCU ROSE-MUNOZLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndra Ruiz / Amy Yeager vs Cherrie Ibbott / Melissa Walters1-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Wilson / Sandy Beasley vs Jody Hassemer / Erin Piel6-7, 1-6
L#3 DoublesSamantha McCartan / Kay Lewis vs Livene Rose-Munoz / Linda Gleason1-6, 3-6
2025-12-20vs TCU ROSE-MUNOZLost 03
L#1 DoublesSandy Beasley / Suzanne Ortolano vs Teresa Merklin / Jody Hassemer2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesKimberly Grogan / Teresa Albus vs Cherrie Ibbott / Melissa Walters3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKay Lewis / Jill Pham vs Livene Rose-Munoz / Lois Fowler1-6, 4-6
2025-12-13vs TCU ROSE-MUNOZLost 03
L#1 DoublesAndra Ruiz / Mary Samuel vs Cherrie Ibbott / Melissa Walters4-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesYvonne Wilson / Linda Quinones vs Livene Rose-Munoz / Teresa Merklin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesGayle van Leeuwen / Samantha McCartan vs Kalisha Lee / Trava Smith7-5, 3-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings1 teams · Sat 9.0 Ladies
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TCU RUIZ0511429182

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.80 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.32
Andra Ruiz
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 5
4.00
Marnie Pizzitola
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.96
Yvonne Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.87
Jill Pham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.85
Kimberly Grogan
usually #2 Doubles 42%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.73
Mary Samuel
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.67
Teresa Albus
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
3.66
Amy Yeager
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.59
Suzanne Ortolano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
3.38
Kay Lewis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Gayle van Leeuwen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Quinones
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Samantha McCartan
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Sandy Beasley
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Teresa Albus + Kimberly Grogan3948% games+2.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Andra Ruiz
0W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.32
Marnie Pizzitola
64W–20L career · 10 lines in 2026
<1%49%51%
4.00
Yvonne Wilson
45W–45L career · 4 lines in 2026
61%39%<1%
3.96
Jill Pham
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%82%18%
3.87
Kimberly Grogan
54W–40L career · 12 lines in 2026
1%85%14%
3.85
Mary Samuel
14W–5L career · 6 lines in 2026
5%92%3%
3.73
Teresa Albus
30W–22L career · 10 lines in 2026
11%88%1%
3.67
4
Amy Yeager
7W–11L career · 6 lines in 2026
13%86%1%
3.66
Suzanne Ortolano
9W–13L career · 2 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.59
Kay Lewis
6W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
81%19%<1%
3.38
Gayle van Leeuwen
1W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Linda Quinones
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Samantha McCartan
1W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Sandy Beasley
3W–8L career · 7 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.