Teams

Liv’Hipp at Salvadore Park

2023 Miami-Dade Adult 18 & Over - Fall Night · 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

7 players · average NTRP 4.50 / REGION_8

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-11-10vs Abdelnur (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Barrellier / Andres Carrero vs Jonathan Drucker / Eliecer Gutierrez6-1, 4-6, 1-0
2022-10-27Won 20
W#2 SinglesMauricio Gomm Santos vs N/A6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesAndres Carrero / Tony Franco vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2022-10-24Split 11
W#1 DoublesAlex Barrellier / Andres Carrero vs Jorge Rodriguez / Ferran Calatayud7-5, 6-1
L#2 SinglesTony Franco vs Marcio Moran6-4, 1-6, 0-1
2022-10-20vs Encinas (Tamiami Park)Split 11
L#1 DoublesAlex Barrellier / Andres Carrero vs Donald Encinas / David Hoffman6-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesTony Franco vs Sean MacAusland6-1, 6-2
2022-10-18vs Encinas (Tamiami Park)Won 10
W#1 DoublesAlex Barrellier / Andres Carrero vs Donald Encinas / Roberto Calderon6-7, 6-2, 1-0
2022-10-06vs Abdelnur (Dante Fascell)Won 10
W#1 DoublesManuel Gil-Goodman / Andres Carrero vs Miguel Fundora / Manuel A Bernardez7-6, 2-6, 1-0
2022-09-01vs Abdelnur (Dante Fascell)Won 20
W#1 DoublesAlex Barrellier / Andres Carrero vs Tom Davidson / Eliecer Gutierrez6-3, 6-0
W#2 SinglesTony Franco vs Sebastian Abdelnur6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.20 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.34
Mauricio Gomm Santos
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
4.29
Sid Doshi
published
4.22
Andres Carrero
usually #1 Doubles 86%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.20
Mitchell Stoller
published
4.11
Denis Pierrot
published 4.5
4.04
Tony Franco
usually #2 Singles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Daniel G Rascoe
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Andres Carrero + Tony Franco213 matchesnot enough data
Mauricio Gomm Santos + Tony Franco303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Mauricio Gomm Santos
71W–28L career · 1 line in 2023
<1%88%12%
4.34
Sid Doshi
4W–4L career · no lines in 2023
1%93%5%
4.29
4.5
Andres Carrero
93W–72L career · 7 lines in 2023
5%94%2%
4.22
Mitchell Stoller
5W–5L career · no lines in 2023
6%93%1%
4.20
4.5
Denis Pierrot
4W–9L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
4.11
Tony Franco
43W–28L career · 4 lines in 2023
39%61%<1%
4.04
Daniel G Rascoe
1W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.