Teams

C 7.5W PW3 DeWerth

2023 NEOTA Combo Fall · NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall

17 players · average NTRP 3.64 / NORTHEASTERN OHIO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-11-17vs C 7.5W MV1 AranavageWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllison Welch / Erica Chiricosta vs Yulia Lyublinski / Diane Roberto6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Katherine Reid vs Shelley Li / Lisa Sackett1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesLaura Anderson / Celia Reid vs Pamela Zalba / Lauren Smith4-6, 2-6
2023-11-10vs OH NEO C 7.5W LightnerLost 12
L#1 DoublesLisa Fallon / Allison Welch vs Morgan Mills / Kelsey Ruddock3-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesNancy Koehler / Katherine Reid vs Komila Mirolimova / Susan Kim1-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSarah Boswell / Erin Carpenter vs Christine Newell / Kate Biggar6-1, 6-0
2023-11-05vs C 7.5W PW2 CiceroLost 12
L#1 DoublesSarah Boswell / Nancy Koehler vs Theresa Smith / ASHLEY ROBERTS3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesErin Carpenter / Diana Lindblom vs Jocelyn Ellis-Abood / Michelle Kuznicki6-2, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Ann Maloney vs Andrea Mattingly / RIJUTA SINGH6-3, 7-6
2023-09-24vs C 7.5W SP KirchnerLost 03
L#1 DoublesKate Began / Celia Reid vs Elizabeth DeLuca / MAGGIE GRAY1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesAnn Dewerth / Katherine Reid vs Michelle Blanda / Jennifer Kirchner3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesDiana Lindblom / Ann Maloney vs Kimberly Stein / Lisa Sharp1-6, 1-6
2023-09-17vs C 7.5W MM TodaroSplit 11
W#1 DoublesKate Began / Celia Reid vs Susie Todaro / Natalie Marotta6-3, 6-4
L#2 DoublesLaura Anderson / Katherine Reid vs Kim Hodgkiss-Lilly / Yulia Glazunova5-7, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for NEOTA 7.5 Combo W Fall have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.31 estimated across 13 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.15
Allison Welch
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
3.74
Kate Began
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.68
Susan Hrdlicka
published
3.44
Jennifer Bucheit
published
3.39
Sarah Boswell
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
3.37
Jennifer Burlingame
published
3.29
Erica Chiricosta
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Celia Reid
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
Diana Lindblom
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Erin Carpenter
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.20
Nancy Koehler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.12
Melissa Wank
published
3.08
Ann Dewerth
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.98
Katherine Reid
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 44% · published
2.96
Ann Maloney
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
2.64
Lisa Fallon
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
Mary Beth Gifford
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Koehler + Jennifer Burlingame8264% games+15.1% vs expected
Allison Welch + Kate Began7161% games+4.5% vs expected
Erica Chiricosta + Kate Began5652% games+4.3% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Susan Hrdlicka4452% games−0.6% vs expected
Nancy Koehler + Katherine Reid71149% games−1.7% vs expected
Jennifer Bucheit + Sarah Boswell7252% games−1.9% vs expected
Katherine Reid + Ann Dewerth203045% games−2.3% vs expected
Jennifer Burlingame + Katherine Reid13951% games−3.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Allison Welch
56W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
4.15
Kate Began
62W–39L career · 4 lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.74
Susan Hrdlicka
72W–32L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.68
Jennifer Bucheit
24W–40L career · no lines in 2023
67%33%<1%
3.44
Sarah Boswell
64W–48L career · 5 lines in 2023
<1%79%21%
3.39
Jennifer Burlingame
79W–55L career · no lines in 2023
<1%84%15%
3.37
3.5
Erica Chiricosta
52W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
1%93%5%
3.29
3.5
Celia Reid
54W–38L career · 8 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Diana Lindblom
5W–9L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
3.5
Erin Carpenter
20W–28L career · 2 lines in 2023
not enough data
Nancy Koehler
56W–71L career · 4 lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.20
Melissa Wank
19W–15L career · no lines in 2023
19%81%<1%
3.12
3.5
Ann Dewerth
60W–68L career · 6 lines in 2023
26%74%<1%
3.08
Katherine Reid
117W–141L career · 9 lines in 2023
56%44%<1%
2.98
3.5
Ann Maloney
38W–60L career · 6 lines in 2023
62%38%<1%
2.96
Lisa Fallon
65W–43L career · 5 lines in 2023
14%86%<1%
2.64
Mary Beth Gifford
26W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.