Teams

KY/LEX/King

2025 USTA WINTER FUN LEAGUE 18 & OVER · Women 3.0

17 players · average NTRP 3.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-03-02vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Won 21
W#1 DoublesCathy Crutchfield / Blake Adams vs Madison Liford / Ann Albrecht6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesShama Hinard vs Lee Ann Sheehy2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesMonica King / Erin Shetler vs Ashley Gillispie / Brittni Fain-Marnitz6-2, 7-6
2025-02-20vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesSachie Shiga / Noriko Hosoda vs Anne West / Amy Johns4-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesErin Shetler vs Kristi Martin0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Allison Moreman vs Leah Lykins / Dana Gerken2-6, 6-7
2025-02-06vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Lost 12
L#1 DoublesAya Tsuchiya / Blake Adams vs April Russell / Rhonda Hilton3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#1 SinglesFeitong Lei vs Callie Manor0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesErin Shetler / Katelyn Meckes vs Lee Ann Sheehy / Amy Johns6-4, 7-6
2025-01-31vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Lost 03
L#1 DoublesTaylor Wilcox / Noriko Hosoda vs Anne West / Kristi Martin2-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAllison Moreman vs Jordan Kiviniemi-Moore0-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRaquel Wilson / Shannon Gay vs Ann Albrecht / Lee Walker2-6, 5-7
2025-01-25vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesFeitong Lei / Sachie Shiga vs Madison Liford / Kara Scott7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesVictoria Sward vs April Russell1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKatie Landon / Caroline Carter vs Ashley Gillispie / Olivia Walker3-6, 6-0, 0-1
2025-01-13vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Lost 12
W#1 DoublesCathy Crutchfield / Katelyn Meckes vs Patty Ni / Kara Scott2-6, 6-1, 1-0
L#1 SinglesShama Hinard vs Callie Manor2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesCaroline Carter / Taylor Wilcox vs Rhonda Hilton / Brittni Fain-Marnitz2-6, 2-6
2025-01-08vs KY/Lex/Wallyker3.0Won 20
W#1 DoublesElizabeth Doss / Monica King vs Leah Lykins / Patty Ni6-3, 7-6
W#2 DoublesRaquel Wilson / Shannon Gay vs Olivia Walker / Amy Johns6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Women 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.69 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Aya Tsuchiya
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.96
Taylor Wilcox
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Katelyn Meckes
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.84
Victoria Sward
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Caroline Carter
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Cathy Crutchfield
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.67
Katie Landon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.67
Raquel Wilson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.66
Allison Moreman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.58
Monica King
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.58
Erin Shetler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
2.57
Feitong Lei
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
2.47
Shama Hinard
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.23
Noriko Hosoda
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Elizabeth Doss
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Sachie Shiga
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Shannon Gay
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Monica King + Shama Hinard134 matchesnot enough data
Monica King + Cathy Crutchfield134 matchesnot enough data
Aya Tsuchiya + Sachie Shiga224 matchesnot enough data
Elizabeth Doss + Monica King123 matchesnot enough data
Raquel Wilson + Monica King123 matchesnot enough data
Raquel Wilson + Shama Hinard213 matchesnot enough data
Raquel Wilson + Shannon Gay213 matchesnot enough data
Monica King + Allison Moreman123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Aya Tsuchiya
44W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%20%80%
3.12
Taylor Wilcox
33W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%61%39%
2.96
Katelyn Meckes
22W–14L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%75%25%
2.90
Victoria Sward
23W–20L career · 1 line in 2025
1%87%12%
2.84
3
Caroline Carter
0W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Cathy Crutchfield
10W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Landon
18W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
Raquel Wilson
23W–24L career · 2 lines in 2025
11%88%1%
2.67
3
Allison Moreman
21W–23L career · 2 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.66
Monica King
12W–44L career · 2 lines in 2025
28%72%<1%
2.58
Erin Shetler
9W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
2.58
Feitong Lei
6W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
31%69%<1%
2.57
Shama Hinard
11W–38L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
2.47
Noriko Hosoda
8W–30L career · 2 lines in 2025
98%2%<1%
2.23
Elizabeth Doss
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Sachie Shiga
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Shannon Gay
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.