Teams

STo (OPRC)

2023 Combo Doubles 18 & Over League · 18 & Over 8.5 Women

10 players · average NTRP 4.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2023-10-03vs ATaylor (Queens)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesKelly Floyd / Shelley Brunker vs Natalie Lombardi / Sophie Pollak3-6, 2-6
2023-09-26vs CStaton (Queens)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKelly Floyd / Sarah Niess vs Sanjana Sudhir / Irma Laney0-6, 0-6
2023-09-19vs THolwager (Lifetime)Lost 01
L#2 DoublesDiane Dumais / Sarah Niess vs Karen Rocchio / Anna Kamenova2-6, 3-6
2023-09-12vs SReynolds (Queens)Lost 02
L#2 DoublesKelly Floyd / Shelley Brunker vs Lizzy Ervin / Megan Griffin2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesBrooke Grindle / Kimberly Valitchka vs Monica Erb / Emma Drake6-3
2023-09-11vs JBlack/MParker (Queens)Split 11
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valitchka / Brooke Grindle vs Julian Black / Ana Bolson4-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesShelley Brunker / Kelly Floyd vs Lauren Woodward / Ashley Price6-1, 2-6, 1-0
2023-09-05vs JVarn (Palisades)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesKimberly Valitchka / Sarah Niess vs Kindell Schmitt / Andi Boston6-7, 1-6
2023-08-22vs XThreet/AHitchins (Queens)Split 11
L#2 DoublesShelley Brunker / Susan Floyd vs Laura Grigoleit / Claire Lieberman4-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesDiane Dumais / Sarah Niess vs Xersalyn Threet / Rachael Schuler3-6, 6-1, 1-0
2023-08-15vs JGardiner (OPRC)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesShelley Brunker / Sandra To vs Sharon Gehrig / Amy Augustine0-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over 8.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.68 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.86
Sarah Niess
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.81
Brooke Grindle
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.75
Sandra To
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.74
Susan Jaffe
published
3.71
Beth Petty
published 4
3.70
Amanda Meloni
published 4
3.69
Shelley Brunker
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
3.58
Kimberly Valitchka
published
3.58
Michelle Ziewacz
published
3.35
Susan Floyd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Brooke Grindle + Sarah Niess314 matchesnot enough data
Shelley Brunker + Sandra To123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Sarah Niess
68W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%83%16%
3.86
4
Brooke Grindle
46W–30L career · 2 lines in 2023
1%90%9%
3.81
4
Sandra To
125W–127L career · 10 lines in 2023
4%93%4%
3.75
Susan Jaffe
17W–19L career · no lines in 2023
<1%4%96%
3.74
4
Beth Petty
7W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%91%2%
3.71
4
Amanda Meloni
6W–8L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%2%
3.70
Shelley Brunker
102W–73L career · 5 lines in 2023
8%90%1%
3.69
Kimberly Valitchka
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
27%73%<1%
3.58
Michelle Ziewacz
1W–8L career · no lines in 2023
29%71%<1%
3.58
Susan Floyd
18W–10L career · 1 line in 2023
1%86%14%
3.35

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.