Teams

Baseline Blues

NEM Adult 18 & Over Spring · NEM 18&O 3.0 W Spring

10 players · average NTRP 3.00 / N.E. MICHIGAN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-06-28vs Midland Slice GirlsLost 12
W#1 DoublesSuzanna McGraw / Mary Haslam vs Shaina Moore / Nicole Felten6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesRoshonda Schmitt vs Jordyn Brown1-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 SinglesAmy Brushaber vs Grace Foco4-6, 2-6
2024-06-18vs Midland Slice GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesSuzanna McGraw / Roshonda Schmitt vs Grace Foco / Jordyn Brown6-2, 5-7, 0-1
2024-06-15vs Midland Slice GirlsWon 41
W#1 DoublesTraci Smith / Holly Snelenberger vs Grace Foco / Brooke Spence6-0, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSerena Wu vs Jordyn Brown1-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesDana Courtline / Amy Brushaber vs Emily Brown / Jessica Rausch6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesSummer Sanderude vs Nicole Felten6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMiranda Sansom / Mary Haslam vs Lori Christiansen / Shaina Moore6-1, 6-2
2024-06-08vs Midland Slice GirlsWon 41
W#1 DoublesTraci Smith / Holly Snelenberger vs Monica Bissett / Emily Brown6-1, 6-0
L#1 SinglesSerena Wu vs Jordyn Brown4-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCasey Ross / Dana Courtline vs Jessica Rausch / Shaina Moore6-1, 6-1
W#2 SinglesAmy Brushaber vs Grace Foco6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesMiranda Sansom / Suzanna McGraw vs Rania Esteitie / Lori Christiansen6-1, 6-2
2024-06-01vs Midland Slice GirlsWon 41
W#1 DoublesCasey Ross / Traci Smith vs Monica Bissett / Brooke Spence4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#1 SinglesSerena Wu vs Jordyn Brown6-2, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesSuzanna McGraw / Amy Brushaber vs Shaina Moore / Jessica Rausch6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesSummer Sanderude vs Grace Foco6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesDana Courtline / Mary Haslam vs Lori Christiansen / Rania Esteitie6-4, 6-0
2024-05-24vs Midland Slice GirlsWon 31
W#1 DoublesTraci Smith / Holly Snelenberger vs Grace Foco / Brooke Spence6-0, 6-4
L#1 SinglesCasey Ross vs Jordyn Brown3-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesSummer Sanderude / Serena Wu vs Lori Christiansen / Nicole Felten6-0, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMiranda Sansom / Dana Courtline vs Jessica Rausch / Emily Brown6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · NEM 18&O 3.0 W Spring
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Baseline Blues4116919158
2Midland Slice Girls1461940266

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Brushaber
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published 3
Casey Ross
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 3
Dana Courtline
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3
Holly Snelenberger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
Mary Haslam
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Miranda Sansom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Roshonda Schmitt
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #2 Singles 20% · published
Serena Wu
usually #1 Singles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Summer Sanderude
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Suzanna McGraw
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Brushaber
3W–1L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Casey Ross
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Dana Courtline
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Holly Snelenberger
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Haslam
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Miranda Sansom
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Roshonda Schmitt
0W–8L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
Serena Wu
1W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Summer Sanderude
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Suzanna McGraw
3W–3L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.