Teams

ALL DECK

2025 Fall Lone Star Ladies Social League · Fall Social Lone Star

5 players · average NTRP 2.67 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-11-06vs SO WHITMIREWon 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Cole / Allison Khan vs Kelley Burt / Heather Teems6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAlicia Deck / Megan Sather vs Lizzie Whitmire / Katie Forman1-6, 6-4, 1-0
2025-10-16vs SO WHITMIRELost 02
L#1 DoublesSusan Cole / Megan Sather vs Lynnette Kile / Lizzie Whitmire2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAlicia Deck / Julie Neuman vs Julia Gadberry / Heather Teems6-7, 6-7
2025-09-25vs SO WHITMIREWon 20
W#1 DoublesAllison Khan / Ambree Smith vs Jordan Cohen / Julia Gadberry6-2, 0-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Cole / Alicia Deck vs Kelley Burt / Heather Teems6-2, 1-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Fall Social Lone Star have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.39 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Allison Khan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.31
Ambree Smith
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.31
Alicia Deck
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.28
Julie Neuman
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.24
Megan Sather
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Neuman + Ambree Smith4245% gamesnot enough data
Alicia Deck + Megan Sather134 matchesnot enough data
Allison Khan + Ambree Smith303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Allison Khan
36W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%92%7%
2.81
2.5
Ambree Smith
18W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
2.5
Alicia Deck
9W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%93%7%
2.31
Julie Neuman
5W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%96%4%
2.28
Megan Sather
6W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.24

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.