Teams

Appleby/Nashville

2023 Adult 40 & Over - Nashville · 3.5 Women - FRI AM

14 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2023-05-05vs McNabb/Adams/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Desiree Appleby vs Jennifer Thomas / Marsha Simoneaux7-5, 3-6, 1-0
2023-05-03vs Todesco/Manley/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Jennie Reese vs Missy Eisenhauer / Marian Vangeli6-3, 6-3
2023-03-31vs Parker/NashvilleWon 10
W#2 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Elizabeth Ward vs Lucy Duvall / Catherine Lale6-1, 6-2
2023-03-24vs Pulley/NashvilleWon 10
W#1 DoublesDesiree Appleby / Elizabeth Ward vs Karen Pillans / Jane Ringel7-5, 6-3
2023-03-10vs Schneider/Vestevich/NashvilleLost 01
L#1 DoublesElizabeth Ward / Amy Brothers vs Leah Lamphron / Ellie Hardesty3-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women - FRI AM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.43
Lacey Keally
published
3.40
Pia Immordino
published
3.35
Amy Brothers
published 3.5
3.32
Sue Anne Perry
published
3.31
Anne Disney
published 3.5
3.29
Sally Kuhn
published
3.24
Whitney Thompson
published
3.18
Jennie Reese
published
3.15
Bettina Moore
published 3.5
3.11
Desiree Appleby
published 3.5
3.05
3.03
Tawny Tapp
published
2.95
Elizabeth Ward
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
2.82
Heidi Kaye
published 3.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bettina Moore + Whitney Thompson12752% games+1.3% vs expected
Jennie Reese + Elizabeth Ward044 matchesnot enough data
Anne Disney + Elizabeth Ward044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lacey Keally
30W–33L career · no lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.43
Pia Immordino
2W–4L career · no lines in 2023
79%21%<1%
3.40
3.5
Amy Brothers
3W–5L career · no lines in 2023
<1%88%12%
3.35
Sue Anne Perry
36W–34L career · no lines in 2023
1%91%8%
3.32
3.5
Anne Disney
2W–6L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.31
Sally Kuhn
3W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%94%5%
3.29
Whitney Thompson
14W–12L career · no lines in 2023
3%94%2%
3.24
Jennie Reese
1W–7L career · no lines in 2023
8%91%1%
3.18
3.5
Bettina Moore
16W–13L career · no lines in 2023
13%87%<1%
3.15
3.5
Desiree Appleby
11W–24L career · no lines in 2023
20%80%<1%
3.11
3.5
Catherine Williamson
0W–7L career · no lines in 2023
34%66%<1%
3.05
Tawny Tapp
4W–7L career · no lines in 2023
40%60%<1%
3.03
3.5
Elizabeth Ward
110W–130L career · 5 lines in 2023
66%34%<1%
2.95
3.5
Heidi Kaye
3W–7L career · no lines in 2023
91%9%<1%
2.82

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.