Teams

Moysey

2026 South East Tennis Combo League 18 & OVER · Women 2.5

15 players · average NTRP 2.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
2026-08-19Won 30
W#1 DoublesMacKenzie Head / Kristin Pinder vs Colleen Jennings / Anna Stone6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAshley Outten / Chloe Hockham vs Molly Reger / Katharina Pupacz6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Leslie Hamilton vs Maranda Spinweber / Demi Marchello6-3, 6-3
2026-08-15vs Dengate/BaldersonWon 20
W#1 DoublesDiana Lancaster / Corbett Jaziri vs Genie Mason / Erica O'Brien6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Borges / Eleni Pappamihiel vs Kelli Dengate / April Robbins6-1, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings5 teams · Women 2.5
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Moysey1030120
2Marchello 20261124860
3Dengate/Balderson000000
4Rooney/Johnson000000
5Fitzpatrick0112424

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.58 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.77
Kathleen Curley
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.74
Diana Lancaster
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.72
Caitie Connor
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
2.69
Chelsea Weaver
published 2.5
2.68
Kristin Pinder
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
2.66
Cameron Smithwick
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
2.62
Corbett Jaziri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.61
Liz Moysey
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.59
MacKenzie Head
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.55
Diane Byrd
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.54
Chloe Hockham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.49
Eleni Pappamihiel
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.48
Elizabeth Borges
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Ashley Outten
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.17
Leslie Hamilton
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kristin Pinder + MacKenzie Head3353% games+4.1% vs expected
Diane Byrd + Leslie Hamilton314 matchesnot enough data
Liz Moysey + Cameron Smithwick314 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kathleen Curley
45W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%3%97%
2.77
2.5
Diana Lancaster
32W–17L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%4%96%
2.74
2.5
Caitie Connor
31W–12L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%6%94%
2.72
2.5
Chelsea Weaver
12W–1L career · type S · no lines in 2026
0%8%92%
2.69
Kristin Pinder
34W–12L career · 5 lines in 2026
0%10%90%
2.68
2.5
Cameron Smithwick
31W–13L career · type A · 2 lines in 2026
0%12%88%
2.66
2.5
Corbett Jaziri
17W–5L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
0%19%81%
2.62
Liz Moysey
33W–26L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%21%79%
2.61
MacKenzie Head
25W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%26%74%
2.59
2.5
Diane Byrd
30W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%36%64%
2.55
Chloe Hockham
14W–9L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%38%62%
2.54
Eleni Pappamihiel
22W–24L career · 2 lines in 2026
0%53%47%
2.49
Elizabeth Borges
31W–14L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%57%43%
2.48
2.5
Ashley Outten
25W–27L career · 3 lines in 2026
0%86%14%
2.35
Leslie Hamilton
13W–17L career · 4 lines in 2026
0%99%1%
2.17

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.