Teams

SGV FLoBS-Willaman-Scholl CYN/SU5

2025 SoCal FALL Team Singles · SGV - Women 3.5

14 players · average NTRP 3.31 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-12-13vs SGV Dare Doubles-Flores-WN/SAWon 10
W#1 SinglesAlexis Halejian vs ANALILY PARK7-6, 6-0
W#1 SinglesClaire Rifelj vs Tanya Robinson6-0, 6-4
W#2 SinglesLourdes Duarte vs Tracy Lee6-0, 6-2
W#3 SinglesAndrea Wong vs LINH LEE6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMelanie Minichino vs Minnie Ingersoll0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Women 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.15 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.45
Melanie Minichino
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.43
Shelly Cohen
published
3.40
Jessie Young
published
3.40
Claire Rifelj
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.29
Jennifer Giancola
published 3.5
3.17
Jennifer Sung
published
3.17
Stefani Galvagni
published 3
3.15
Alana Vormehr
published 3.5
3.14
Andrea Wong
usually #3 Singles 100% · published 3.5
3.14
Sophie Kweskin
published
2.97
Alexis Halejian
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.89
Nancy Wong-Thomas
published
2.85
Lourdes Duarte
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.69
Karen Willaman
published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Stefani Galvagni + Jennifer Giancola4156% games+7.7% vs expected
Karen Willaman + Jennifer Giancola5849% games+6.9% vs expected
Stefani Galvagni + Karen Willaman5549% games−4.8% vs expected
Melanie Minichino + Jessie Young5069% gamesnot enough data
Shelly Cohen + Melanie Minichino213 matchesnot enough data
Shelly Cohen + Jennifer Giancola213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Melanie Minichino
76W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%65%35%
3.45
Shelly Cohen
28W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.43
Jessie Young
29W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.40
3.5
Claire Rifelj
34W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
Jennifer Giancola
35W–32L career · no lines in 2025
2%92%6%
3.29
Jennifer Sung
19W–11L career · no lines in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
3
Stefani Galvagni
129W–81L career · no lines in 2025
<1%12%88%
3.17
3.5
Alana Vormehr
1W–5L career · no lines in 2025
14%86%1%
3.15
3.5
Andrea Wong
7W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
16%84%1%
3.14
Sophie Kweskin
2W–3L career · no lines in 2025
16%83%<1%
3.14
3
Alexis Halejian
6W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%59%41%
2.97
Nancy Wong-Thomas
2W–6L career · no lines in 2025
<1%78%22%
2.89
Lourdes Duarte
11W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Karen Willaman
64W–78L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
2.69

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.