Teams

SDNC 3.0WD La Costa (3:2)/ Ciccarelli

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring - SDNC WD · SDNC - Women - 3.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
W#1 DoublesKatie Ciccarelli / Heather Gonzalez vs Nicole Vassey-Watson / Taylor Moyer7-5, 7-6
L#1 SinglesRebecca Linney vs Kristin Ziebart0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Hicks / Arghavan Parsi vs Luba Kagan / Jori Tulkki7-5, 2-6, 0-1
W#2 SinglesHeather Kirwan vs Nana Matoba7-5, 3-2
W#3 DoublesSusan Chase / Athena Schmid vs Jennifer DeBiasi / Carolyn Shea6-3, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.78 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.26
Heather Kirwan
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.04
Elizabeth Romero
published
2.89
Janine Aldover
published
2.85
Alli Ward
published 3
2.82
Pamela Hildebrand
published
2.81
Heather Gonzalez
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.73
Arghavan Parsi
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.64
Libby Laplante
published
2.63
Stephanie Wheeler
published
2.49
Athena Schmid
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.47
Angela Hicks
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elyse Metzger
published
Katie Ciccarelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Rebecca Linney
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
Ruth Utti
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Libby Laplante + Arghavan Parsi213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Heather Kirwan
16W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
3%92%5%
3.26
Elizabeth Romero
1W–2L career · no lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Janine Aldover
5W–5L career · no lines in 2025
<1%77%22%
2.89
3
Alli Ward
5W–7L career · no lines in 2025
1%85%14%
2.85
Pamela Hildebrand
3W–1L career · no lines in 2025
1%89%10%
2.82
Heather Gonzalez
4W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%90%8%
2.81
3
Arghavan Parsi
5W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
5%92%3%
2.73
Libby Laplante
3W–18L career · no lines in 2025
17%83%<1%
2.64
Stephanie Wheeler
10W–3L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
2.63
3
Athena Schmid
3W–3L career · type A · 1 line in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.49
3
Angela Hicks
1W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
59%41%<1%
2.47
Elyse Metzger
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Katie Ciccarelli
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Rebecca Linney
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Ruth Utti
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.