Teams

TLJBanner/Peninsula

2022 Lake USTA Tri Level Level 18 & Over · Men's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 Thurs pm

12 players · average NTRP 3.71 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2022-07-28vs TLVSampoornam/NMP dolphinsLost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Moore / James Banner vs Venkatesh Sampoornam / Jonathan Wainwright1-6, 6-1, 0-1
2022-07-14vs TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-BWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Banner / Alfu Miah vs Michael Crutchfield / David Boone6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLouis Foreman / Brent King vs Jeff Chilton / Jeffrey McCue6-0, 7-5
2022-06-30vs TLRCA-Caballer/NMP-Tri18+Lost 01
L#1 DoublesBill Moore / Ryan Whalen vs Roberto Caballero / Neil White4-6, 3-6
2022-06-23vs TLVSampoornam/NMP dolphinsWon 20
W#1 DoublesJames Banner / Alfu Miah vs Jonathan Wainwright / Venkatesh Sampoornam6-1, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLouis Foreman / Brent King vs Ranjith Rajadurai / Julius Fernandez6-2, 6-2
2022-06-02vs TLMCR-Crutch/CSD/Tri-BWon 10
W#3 DoublesJames Borders / Louis Foreman vs Jeff Chilton / Timothy Vallejos6-1, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men's Group B 3.0, 3.5 & 4.0 Thurs pm have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.44 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Louis Foreman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.75
Bill Moore
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.70
Alfu Miah
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Ryan Whalen
published
3.38
Marc Lelong
published
3.31
Robb Stamey
published
3.30
James Borders
published 3.5
3.29
Brent King
published 3.5
3.28
Artemas Holmes
published 3.5
3.23
Kevin Confoy
published 3.5
3.17
Jim Beam
published
Kevin Shaughnessy
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Louis Foreman + Bill Moore7361% games+7.0% vs expected
Alfu Miah + Louis Foreman6260% games+4.9% vs expected
Alfu Miah + Bill Moore5645% games+1.4% vs expected
Jim Beam + Robb Stamey134 matchesnot enough data
Artemas Holmes + Jim Beam213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Louis Foreman
266W–113L career · 3 lines in 2022
1%93%6%
3.79
4
Bill Moore
131W–92L career · 2 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Alfu Miah
103W–107L career · 2 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
3.70
Ryan Whalen
4W–9L career · no lines in 2022
17%83%<1%
3.62
Marc Lelong
1W–5L career · no lines in 2022
83%17%<1%
3.38
Robb Stamey
4W–7L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.31
3.5
James Borders
6W–5L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%7%
3.30
3.5
Brent King
6W–11L career · no lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.29
3.5
Artemas Holmes
18W–17L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Kevin Confoy
64W–47L career · no lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
Jim Beam
9W–16L career · no lines in 2022
10%89%<1%
3.17
Kevin Shaughnessy
1W–2L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.