Teams

Mystery 3.5W

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Women

9 players · average NTRP 3.50 / ALASKA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2021-05-08vs Marlys & TriinSplit 22
L#1 DoublesDenise Henderson / Stacia Green vs Karen Loeffler / Allison Erickson0-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesZareena Clendaniel vs Aracelis Bell1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesCindy Nunn / Bonnie Hemry vs Triin Minton / Marlys Morton6-4, 0-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesSandy Durrell / Jessie Lief vs Susan Brunner / Conita Mullett6-4, 6-2
2021-05-08vs Marlys & TriinLost 12
L#1 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Vicki Moe vs Karen Loeffler / Allison Erickson1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesCindy Nunn vs Aracelis Bell4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesDenise Henderson / Stacia Green vs Triin Minton / Marlys Morton3-6, 4-6
2021-05-07vs Marlys & TriinLost 13
L#1 DoublesStacia Green / Sandy Durrell vs Karen Loeffler / Aracelis Bell0-6, 6-7
L#1 SinglesCindy Nunn vs Allison Erickson6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesDana Griffin / Bonnie Hemry vs Triin Minton / Marlys Morton6-2, 5-7, 0-1
W#3 DoublesZareena Clendaniel / Vicki Moe vs Conita Mullett / Susan Brunner6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 3.5 Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Marlys & Triin03751298
2Mystery 3.5W035716119

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Denise Henderson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.44
Stacia Green
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.20
Jessie Lief
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.06
Dana Griffin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
Bonnie Hemry
published
Cindy Nunn
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 0
Sandy Durrell
published
Vicki Moe
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Denise Henderson + Stacia Green1441% games−12.7% vs expected
Stacia Green + Jessie Lief224 matchesnot enough data
Stacia Green + Zareena Clendaniel134 matchesnot enough data
Denise Henderson + Sandy Durrell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Denise Henderson
21W–22L career · type A · 2 lines in 2021
<1%23%77%
3.59
3.5
Stacia Green
93W–65L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%67%32%
3.44
3.5
Zareena Clendaniel
58W–96L career · type M · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Jessie Lief
77W–91L career · 1 line in 2021
6%93%1%
3.20
3.5
Dana Griffin
111W–86L career · 1 line in 2021
33%67%<1%
3.06
Bonnie Hemry
2W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
0
Cindy Nunn
25W–31L career · 3 lines in 2021
not enough data
Sandy Durrell
97W–83L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Vicki Moe
14W–10L career · 2 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.