Teams

PRC RED

2024 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER

8 players · average NTRP 2.83 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-15vs SH GREENLost 12
W#1 DoublesChris Sanchez / Jeff Smith vs Ari Brunschwig / Ben Hick6-0, 7-6
L#2 DoublesHorst Kisch / Steve Belczynski vs Chris Olson / Travis Vap3-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#3 DoublesJon Pulliam / Eric Maul vs Ben Brown / John Simonton6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2024-07-08vs CPV REDWon 21
W#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Steve Belczynski vs Pete Rather / Stefan Lanziner6-4, 7-6
W#2 DoublesEric Maul / Jeff Smith vs Timothy Linsenmeyer / Bradford Smith7-6, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChris Sanchez / Bruce Ohman vs Jeth Harbinson / Charles Skinner5-7, 1-6
2024-07-01vs HRCA-S GREENSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Steve Belczynski vs Patrick Gallagher / Giri Talluri3-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesBruce Ohman vs Michael Rowley1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJon Pulliam / Eric Maul vs PUVIARASU SETTU / D Patrick Fleming0-6, 7-5, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Sanchez / David Mcdevitt vs Gautam Prabhakar Begde / Michael Garcia5-7, 6-2, 1-0
2024-06-25vs WC BLUEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJon Pulliam / Eric Maul vs Aaron Muhl / Whitney Schrandt6-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBruce Ohman vs Tim Royal0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesHorst Kisch / Jeff Smith vs Robert Parmer / Jeff Milanovich6-2, 6-0
2024-06-17vs DCHS NAVYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesDavid Mcdevitt / Jeff Smith vs Ralph Yatsko / Bryan LaRussa6-4, 7-6
L#1 SinglesHorst Kisch vs George Casey2-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJon Pulliam / Eric Maul vs Kelvin Southards / Anthony Guardian6-2, 7-5
L#3 DoublesBruce Ohman / Chris Sanchez vs Patrick Barrow / Tom Jeffrey2-6, 2-6
2024-06-10vs SH GREENLost 12
L#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Bruce Ohman vs Ari Brunschwig / Ben Hick3-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesDavid Mcdevitt vs Chris Olson6-3, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJon Pulliam / Steve Belczynski vs Robert Schmela / Travis Vap3-6, 1-6
2024-06-03vs CPV REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesHorst Kisch / Eric Maul vs Andrew Boutilier / Carsten Hannen4-6, 6-1, 0-1
L#1 SinglesBruce Ohman vs Bill Aplin0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSteve Belczynski / Jeff Smith vs Pete Rather / Rob Marchant7-5, 5-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesChris Sanchez / Jon Pulliam vs Kevin Manion / Bradford Smith6-4, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings41 teams · MEN 3.0 - 40 & OVER
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1LTA-Q BLUE7022617196
2LTA-P BLUE6121715148
3CCC NAVY6120818207
4LTFC YELLOW6121718191
5SS-LT RED6121720200
6CM BLUE6119920211
7SKY GREEN6121721228
8PH GREEN6121721228
9WC BLUE6122621207
10HRCA-N BLUE6120822215
11CPV BLUE5220821222
12HG RED52171123192
13GPTC RED52161226209
14WP RED52141429251
15CVHS BLUE43161225221
16RMTC BLUE43171128252
17BRMST RED43161229255
18TTA BLUE43131532260
19KC-CC YELLOW43131532252
20BCST RED43131536268
21DCHS RED43121636252
22HV YELLOW34151330244
23CCV RED34141433242
24PRC RED34151333271
25KNO BLUE34131533221
26CM RED34121637282
27LTA-P RED34131537282
28RHCC RED3491940282
29CK RED25141431265
30GR BLUE25131533274
31NJ YELLOW25121636269
32WP NAVY25101837269
33BM BLUE2582043312
34VCC GREEN1682042306
35CP GREEN1682042295
36MC BLUE1682043297
37HRCA-N RED1682043266
38ATC BLUE1672147305
39FOX PURPLE0752346306
40NJ NAVY0722654332
41GCC RED0702856336

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.56 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Chris Sanchez
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.61
Eric Maul
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.61
Kyle Logan
published
2.49
David Mcdevitt
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.47
Jon Pulliam
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.17
Bruce Ohman
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 2.5
Horst Kisch
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
Steve Belczynski
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jon Pulliam + Eric Maul4254% games+8.8% vs expected
Chris Sanchez + Jon Pulliam1536% games−7.9% vs expected
Horst Kisch + Steve Belczynski123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Chris Sanchez
13W–26L career · 5 lines in 2024
<1%51%49%
3.00
Eric Maul
6W–10L career · 6 lines in 2024
22%78%<1%
2.61
Kyle Logan
4W–8L career · no lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
2.61
3
David Mcdevitt
5W–9L career · 3 lines in 2024
52%48%<1%
2.49
Jon Pulliam
11W–24L career · 6 lines in 2024
59%41%<1%
2.47
2.5
Bruce Ohman
4W–30L career · 6 lines in 2024
0%99%1%
2.17
Horst Kisch
14W–17L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Steve Belczynski
2W–3L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.