Teams

BAY CLUB COURTSIDE CM7.5B

2025 COMBO · Men 7.5

22 players · average NTRP 3.78 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-08-30vs MORGAN HILL TC CM7.5ALost 12
W#1 DoublesGrant Wollen / Alexander Liu vs Rhoel Garcia / Ric Andres7-5, 7-5
L#2 DoublesGreg Riggs / Seongsik Chang vs Murali Mohan Putta / Elliott Do3-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesEmad Gad / Bob Whitaker vs John Stephani / Philip Madriaga4-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 7.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.54 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Grant Wollen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.87
Ryan Low
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Slaven Tezak
published
3.76
Martin Lundie
published
3.72
Greg Riggs
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.72
Imran Hashim
published 4
3.67
Robert Gagliasso
published
3.65
Hal Kalechofsky
published 4
3.64
Abhijeet Karnik
published 4
3.63
Emad Gad
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.62
Tim Bergeson
published
3.61
Joshua Spin
published
3.57
Patrick Hare
published
3.43
Steve Degner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.36
Paul Wang
published
Gautam Thockchom
published 3.5
3.19
Bob Whitaker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.09
William McCombe
published
3.00
Truls Myklebust
published
2.89
Dazhi Wang
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Seongsik Chang
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Grant Wollen
14W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%38%62%
4.04
Ryan Low
59W–10L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%84%16%
3.87
Slaven Tezak
15W–6L career · no lines in 2025
1%93%6%
3.80
Martin Lundie
10W–8L career · no lines in 2025
2%94%3%
3.76
4
Greg Riggs
3W–15L career · 1 line in 2025
4%94%2%
3.72
4
Imran Hashim
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
5%94%2%
3.72
Robert Gagliasso
3W–9L career · no lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.67
4
Hal Kalechofsky
5W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%87%<1%
3.65
4
Abhijeet Karnik
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%<1%
3.64
4
Emad Gad
3W–5L career · 1 line in 2025
15%84%<1%
3.63
Tim Bergeson
5W–9L career · no lines in 2025
18%82%<1%
3.62
Joshua Spin
6W–8L career · no lines in 2025
20%80%<1%
3.61
Patrick Hare
6W–9L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Steve Degner
7W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%71%29%
3.43
Paul Wang
3W–7L career · no lines in 2025
<1%86%14%
3.36
3.5
Gautam Thockchom
0W–2L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bob Whitaker
15W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
7%92%1%
3.19
William McCombe
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
<1%24%76%
3.09
Truls Myklebust
2W–5L career · no lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.00
3
Dazhi Wang
2W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%81%19%
2.89
Krishnaprasad Krishnamoorthy
1W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data
Seongsik Chang
0W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.